Why does the energy infrastructure in America in America hinder the future of artificial intelligence?
American data centers may require up to 945 hours of Terawatt (TwH) of electricity by 2030, as the International Energy Agency (IEA) in Japan warns. What nourishes this request? artificial intelligence.
However, it is very clear to the current Power network It actually stretches thin, struggles to meet the requirements of electricity. Add anything more, and you may just confuse.
It can translate more pressure on energy infrastructure into rooted energy bills, brown, and power outages of the American public. Worse, if the network is not able to provide enough energy, it may prevent the technology industry, which may suffocate the development of artificial intelligence before companies can start exploring half of their capabilities.
The United States is still dealing with the elderly energy infrastructure in the main states
According to IEA analysis, data centers Consumed 415 TwH in 2024, represented about 1.5 % of global electricity consumption, and artificial intelligence servers a large share of it.
In their report, artificial intelligence servers alone constituted 24 % of the use of server electricity and 15 % of the total energy demand at the data center last year. This is an amazing footprint of technology that is still in its early stages – it is expected to grow only to go forward.
Alex de Freez, a researcher in Fu Amsterdam and founder of the design world, believes that the personalities of the International Energy Agency have been underestimated, describing the statistics of artificial intelligence as somewhat mysterious.
Goldman Sachs has broken down, as it is estimated that artificial intelligence data centers can burn through a 165 % greater power; Even the CEO of ARM warned that artificial intelligence may use 25 % of US electricity by 2030. It looks a bit dramatic, but the real question is, can the country deal with future energy requirements for Amnesty International?
Certainly the government believes this, it sees it already started to issue incentives and implement new regulations at the federal and state level.
For example, in April, President Trump signed executive orders to produce fast-track coal-well to meet the high force requirements for the artificial intelligence industry because the revival of fossil fuels in 2025 is the solution. Well, analysts are not completely happy with the president’s decision. Many doubt that it will be enough, and a violent retreat of the environment gets worse.
Focusing on fossil fuels such as natural gas or coal can reduce the crisis of artificial intelligence, but building new fossil fuel facilities may take at least three to five years. If we are talking about nuclear plants, it may take longer, nearly seven to 15 years. Moreover, renewable energy sources such as solar energy and winds require an expensive battery storage to maintain fixed energy for artificial intelligence databases.
Not to mention that multiple transport lines and sub -stations are in several states more than 50 years. Talk about the old. Some go back to the nineteenth century, especially in Boston, Philadelphia, New York and Chicago, who raises the question, is there really a way to meet the needs of Amnesty International, or do companies should rethink their technology development strategies?
CEO Michael Bolsky asks the government to support power developers.
The United States is still focused on overcoming China in developing artificial intelligence. However, if there is an opportunity to win, you will need to invest in the highways of power to move large quantities of electricity, according to the President of Inventy LLC, Michael Polsky.
It argues that creating a national transportation activity to create high -voltage lines can record the process. His words: “I think it is an emergency because of how difficult it is to build things. We don’t have contracts to find out. We have years.”
In addition, the government suggested that the government provide support for power developers as it does to others such as Musk and SpacSIPs. He claimed that they should also be somewhat compensated for their investments.
However, the Trump administration appears to be hell on the budget cuts, especially on clean energy developers. Only last month, the government made nearly $ 4 billion to support some clean energy projects. Not to mention that the financing of the BETT BelT Express project in Inventergy may be the next on the cutting block, which means that it may lose about $ 11 billion can transport 5 GB of energy over 800 miles.
However, the President of the Investy Jim Murphy believes that the government will continue to finance its project. Polsky argued that their project was a source of national concern.
