The US government urged the Supreme Court not to take over the Coinbase user challenge against the IRS efforts to obtain its encryption transactions records.
in presentation On May 30, Public Attorney De John Saw has argued that the Coinbase James Harper user has no right to the fourth amendment to protect his financial records kept by the stock exchange.
The government claimed that Harper “voluntarily” shared his data with Coinbase, and that the Tax Authority has followed the appropriate legal procedures to obtain it by calling a judicial accredited.
The Harper case focuses on achieving the 2016 Tax Authority in widespread tax reporting on encrypted currency gains. At that time, the Tax Authority discovered a sharp gap between millions of Coinbase users who trade Bitcoin (BTC) and a relatively small number of taxpayers who reported the encryption gains.
In response, the agency obtained the so -called “John de” to summon Coinbase to deliver the records to large -sized customers.
Related to: Coinbase Data Breach 2025: What was stolen and what you need to know
Coinbase user sucks the Tax Authority to search for encryption records
Harper, who exchanged Bitcoin over Coinbase during the relevant years, filed a lawsuit at a later time, claiming that the Tax Authority actions live up to an unconstitutional research for his personal records.
The minimum courts opposed, and ruled that Coinbase’s records are business documents – not Harper’s private papers – and that the Tax Authority acted legally.
In its summary, the government argued that the precedent of the Supreme Court supports the Tax Authority position. Quoted from previous cases such as United States against MillerThe government confirmed that individuals do not have reasonable expectations for privacy in the financial records of Coinbase.
The file also referred to the Coinbase’s privacy policy, which has warned users that information can be shared with the application of the law.
The government said: “To the extent that the owner of the petition submitted these arguments below, the Court of Appeal refused correctly that it was prohibited in the precedent of this court and there is no argument in it.”
The Supreme Court has not yet decided whether it would hear the case. Denial will be left in the place of the first circle ruling in favor of the Tax Authority.
Related to: The retired artist loses two million dollars in encryption to impersonating Coinbase
Coinbase suffers from the main data breach
On May 15, Coinbase revealed a violation of the data in which the attackers broke the customer support staff in India to access sensitive user information.
The stolen data included customer names, account balances, and the date of transactions. Coinbase confirmed that the breach affected about 1 % of the monthly transactions users. Among the affected people, the capitalist capitalist Rowovov Batha, the administrative partner in Sikoya Capital.
Coinbase has also faced a wave of lawsuits after revelation. At least six legal complaints have been submitted on May 15 and 16, as prosecutors accuse the exchange of failure in the implementation of sufficient security measures and poor response to breach. magazine: Coinbase Hack shows that the law may not protect you: this is the reason
Related Articles
