The SEC’s encryption war fades with Coinbase’s decrease

Since US President Donald Trump took office, the Securities and Stock Exchange Committee (SEC) has brought down lawsuits or temporarily stopped against the left and right encoding entities. In a blatant contradiction with the leadership of the previous administration during the era of President Gary Ginsner, the Supreme Education Council appears to be separated from a campaign of campaign against previous digital assets.

In an interview with Beincrypto, the most prominent Nick Puckrin, founder of the currency office, Han Huang, CEO of Kronos Research, highlighted the great influence of the encryption industry on Trump’s nomination as a contributing factor in the desired SEC position on Crypto.

The Supreme Education Council approach during the Trump era

SEC has seen a clear shift in her approach to encryption claims under Trump’s presidency. Stay away from the aggressive enforcement tactics of its previous leadership has greatly described this shift.

“When President Donald Trump won the US elections, he rejoiced the encryption industry. Finally, the” enforcement carried out “list, which was the Securities and Stock Exchange Commission under the leadership of Gary Ginsner very famous, was about to finish. The new administration was not disappointed.

Two weeks ago, the Supreme Education Council officially dropped its appeal and the XRP lawsuit against Ripple Labs, which ends a five -year legal battle. The committee was originally accused of Ripple of making unregistered securities of $ 1.3 billion through XRP sales.

“After more than four years in a state of forgetfulness, SEC officially decided that XRP is not safe (although what remains on it instead). This case was highly weighing on XRP – the fourth largest encrypted currency with the maximum market of $ 130 billion – and therefore its decision is a great victory,” Booker added.

The broader encryption community celebrated the result, as many argue that it will put a precedent for how to classify digital assets in the United States. There is a justification for this prediction, given that the Supreme Education Council was on the outbreak of the lawsuit.

Coat and coinbase are determined by great victories

Shortly before ending the rippal suit, SEC dropped its legal battle against Coinbase. The case also focused on whether Coinbase should be classified as safety.

“SEC is clearly backward from its position, which was previously found to encrypt, as it appears in its dismissal in 2025 of the lawsuits against Ripple, Coinbase and others. This transformation, driven by Trump’s friendly organization for encryption and ingenuity, indicates a future of encrypted organization in the United States.”

SEC has also dropped many continuous investigations against Opensea, Robinhood, Uniswap Labs, Kakeen and Gemini. He also asked a federal court to issue a 60 -day stand for lawsuits against Binance. Meanwhile, the committee settled its investigations into Consensys on its ETHEREUM programs.

These lawsuits appeared in parallel with a series of encryption -friendly measures aimed at enhancing more innovation and limiting the potential organizational suffocation that was present during the Biden era.

Will the new driving define clear encryption regulations?

A day after Trump took office, the Chairman of the Board of Directors of SEC Mark Oida announced the establishment of a dedicated coding team led by Commissioner Hyster Peres. According to what was reported, the work group was designed to solve long -term ambiguity in the organizational therapy of digital assets.

In all SEC Crypto lawsuits, Commissioner Uyeda has implemented a strategy that gives priority to the participation of industry to develop organizational frameworks that balance innovation and the protection of the investor.

Meanwhile, Trump nominated Paul Atkins, a candidate for the organization of the organization, to replace Ginsler as head of a second. Only this week, the Senate Banking Committee voted to enhance Atkins’s nomination to the full Senate.

Huang said: “Under Trump, SEC can implement encryption instructions, explained by 2025, reducing organizational burdens, and the decrease in the policies of the Biden era that strangled innovation by 2027. This could be the beginning of the treatment of most digital origins as commodities,” said Huang.

Now, a stone’s goal is that the SEC chair becomes expected to reduce Atkins from the regulatory supervision of encryption.

“By creating a new workplace and major appointed such as Paul Attins, it enhances innovation, Trump’s strategic step to create a bitcoin reserve within the government emphasizes his commitment to supporting industry. The future of encryption regulations will focus on less than supervision and the beginning of promising ice in the organizational scene.”

Although some say that Trump’s dealings with encryption affairs have led to an unprecedented victory, others are exhausting that his increasing participation in the industry has turned into a recipe for disasters.

The effect of encryption donations on the regulations

Many industry leaders have gone extreme to ensure that Trump became the 47th president in America. Millions of dollars in donations from the encryption companies during the Trump campaign made it clear.

According to a public citizen a reportMore than $ 119 million from Crypto Corporaces went to influence the Federal elections for 2024, to a large extent through Virchki, a non -party PAC that supports pro -profit and skeptical candidates.

Coinbase and Ripple, among other things, which make profit, have been submitted directly more than half of the Fairshake financing. The remaining funds came mostly from the executive billionaires of encryption and adventure capitalists. The prominent contributions included $ 44 million from the founders of Andrink Horwitz, $ 5 million of Winklevoss twins, and a million dollars from Coinbase Brian Armstrong.

To date, the Big Crypto’s Big Crypto Strategy is a more suitable environment.

“Political donations from the encryption industry played during the 2024 elections, especially for the candidates supporting the quarter such as Trump, an important role in forming the SEC decision for 2025 to drop lawsuits against encryption companies. These contributions helped in the management of the administration with the interests of industry and influenced Congress, which leads to about 50-60 % of the transformation.”

Without a clear framework to direct the encryption industry after these projected lawsuits, this indolent approach risk as short -lived. Ultimately, this encryption can distort in the long run.

Currency currency fraud highlights the risks of liberation

According to Bokerin, the success of the coordinated lawsuits due to the lack of the regulations that led to the spread of prominent Mimi currency fraud.

“In some way, all these victories feel that they are somewhat hollow after the reputation of the encryption industry due to billions of dollars in joint losses of the Mimi currency. Meanwhile, Hayden Davis, the mastermind of the scale, said in the launch of Mimi’s fraudulent symbols, although it is in the required list,” said Hayden Davis, the mastermind behind the scale, in launching Mimi fraud symbols, although they are in the required list, ”

The 2024 report issued by the Web3 Intelligence Merkle Science platform revealed that the Meme Coin carpet pulls investors more than $ 500 million. The scale incident in February showed how this trend was implemented until 2025. Nansen’s data revealed that 86 % of investors lost $ 251 million, while the Opinors achieved $ 180 million of profits.

Although the encryption contents may be accused of related crimes such as fraud in wires or money laundering, the pulling of the rug is legal. Better said, he’s not perceived. There is no organization that carries the informed of the encryption responsible for the Mimi currency fraud.

“When Crypto becomes more category than ever, consumers must be protected against those who choose to use it for necklace. One way to do this is through education, and this is our function as an industry.

If SEC does not benefit from this opportunity to reduce the consequences that MeMe fraud can produce, this will lead to a tremendous setback of this industry.

A comprehensive organization behind the falling claims

Puckrin explained the need for an increased regulatory clarity in encryption by drawing attention to the way SEC punishes internal trading in the context of traditional investment.

“In traditional investment, trading from within is a serious crime. In the United States, fines of up to $ 5 million for individuals and prison sentences are punished for up to 20 years. Likewise, federal penalties for engaging in illegal gambling activities include up to five years in prison. Savings.” ‭

Puckrin explained, however, that the issue is not only related to the punishment of fraudsters. Just as excessive models at the age of the Supreme Council for Industry, the current lack of Mimi currency rules create an environment in which new fraud and exploitative plans can be flourished easily.

“Yes, the removal of lawsuits is great news to innovate Blockchain, but it is needed to be replaced. In fact, the serious cryptocurrency companies have never bid to the unorganized brutal West. What they want is clarity and rules that are appropriate to the fledgling Blockchain industry-and not just a copy of the current financial regulations that do not work simply for Crypto,” he said.

Although the Trump administration was only valid for four months, the watch beats, and a significant change is time.

Questions not answered on the horizon

Puckrin expressed his concern about setting the priorities of the current management to separate the lawsuit rather than working faster to implement the regulation of transgressive encryption.

“My concern is that the organizers continue to kick the box on the road by organizing the encryption, after they gained the approval of the industry to drop many of the lawsuits that were suffocating its growth. This is incredibly dangerous,” said Beincrypto.

Meanwhile, the critical questions that SEC can only determine is not an answer.

“What is memecoins and who will ensure that no other failures in the scale? Booker concluded.

The current direction of SEC is an organized era or a land breeding land.

With no answer to billions and critical questions, the future of encryption depends on whether the organizational body will translate its recent transformation into a permanent framework that enhances innovation without sacrificing the protection of the investor.