The new ETHEREUM leadership structure causes confusion

Christine Kim, a former head of research head of Galaxy Digital, participated in her fears about the new leadership structure at ETHEREM (EF).

She noted that the main people are now dealing with many roles and said that the new organizational chart is confusing.

Will EF excessive driving?

On July 11 x mailKim noticed that Tim Pico, Barnabe Monut and Alex Stox are responsible for several things at one time. She explained how the three lead all research and development teams, their own management, and work on slicing improvements L1 and L2 and the experience of the user during the next 12 months.

When the organizational plan for the ETHEREUM Foundation participated, the researcher asked the purpose of the distinguished sections and wondered whether Beiko was responsible for coordinating the protocol and supervising multiple projects.

“What are the prominent points?” Kim wrote. “Does Tim lead the TIM format and overseeing PAS, Pandaops, Geth, and Steel?”

The additional concerns that raised the logic behind the coding of colors, which collected functions and related teams under different colors, including purple, light blue, light green and orange.

The previous Coindsk correspondent was curious about the exact logical basis of the gatherings, which I felt was unclear. For example, I asked why consensus consensus in the same category of accounting of the account but not with unanimous consensus or counterpart networks to analogy, and why the test was next to Pandaops instead of safety.

In response, Ethereum Barnabé monnot researcher Make up The bold names on the ORG chart were the strings of a team, with color groups indicating “who every team reports.” However, he admitted that the plan may contain a lot of information, indicating that the current version was somewhat difficult to explain it and could benefit from simplification or removal.

Community reactions

Restructuring comes at a time when EF faces continuous criticism about its comprehensive management and strategy. Community members have warned that if the organization fails to solve the main technical problems, Ethereum may lose its strong position on the market.

The non-profit organization responded by making changes, starting from early March, when HSIA-WEI Wang was appointed and Tomasz Stańczak as participating executives. This was followed by the latest reorganization, which included the demobilization of employees and the renamination of the Research and Development of the Protocol to “Protocol” only.

The reaction was mixed with the renewal. Some people have responded positively, as Wang says she hopes the new setting will help the difference to focus on the center in moving forward in moving forward. On the other hand, Kyle Samani, co -founder of Multicoin Capital, pointed out a possible contradiction between network development and improving user experience while employees’ refusal.

The PECTRA upgrade job discounts follow the last Pectra from Ethereum, which also raised concerns about possible security weaknesses. Specifically, it was eip-7702 exploited In hunting attacks that affected more than 10,000 titles. There were also reports of harmful contracts targeting the weak metamask users.