The XRP lawsuit has taken an unprecedented touch with the appearance of a mysterious file, leaving a lot to wonder about the motives of the individual and the possible effects on the case. This unexpected and unconventional move sparked a discussion between industrial monitors, including Bill Morgan and Marsh Vagil. Will this deposit fluctuate the results of the CEC case against SEC?
The XRP lawsuit sees unexpected files, and weighs experts
As XRP lawyer Bill Morgan indicatedThe mysterious Justin Kerner Justin Kerner file that shook the encryption community was returned. With the same emergency request to submit “decisive evidence” in a prominent XRP suit, Kener rebuilt the proposal on May 28. According to the deposit, the evidence mentioned is preparing to transform the results of the state of ripples for the benefit of the defendants. Big countries,
I, Justin W. Kenner, I’m not a party to this lawsuit but I suggest that I have an interest in its results for multiple reasons. For the sake of one – through the miracle of God – I carry the data and information that is believed to be decisive evidence to settle the dominant questions and central issues to 10 years of nightmare chaos that all reassured Americans have given us.
It is worth noting that the XRP lawyer Bill Morgan expressed his surprise at the deposit. It describes it as a long criticism of the individual to test Howy and his judicial interpretation, especially with regard to investment contracts. Morgan is called an unexpected step in view of the last chapter of Ripple and the SEC joint movement to obtain an indicator ruling and the next deadline for the SEC case report.
Meanwhile, former SEC lawyer Mark Vagil indicated that the individual has submitted a second file in the case, noting that the Supreme Education Council had responded to his previous presentation. He wonders why the court does not restrict its access to unauthorized files.
How will this mysterious deposit affect the CEC suit against SEC?
Although Kenner’s initial attempt in April 2025 to search for the court’s approval to submit the so -called “decisive evidence” in the rippal case, it re -submitted the proposal. Now, the XRP community is still keen on knowing its potential effect on the XRP suit, which is still unconfirmed. Many expect the court to reject the request again, after its previous dismissal, because it is considered “inappropriate”. Miscellaneous, the court’s response to this deposit is likely to determine the SEC’s reaction to its effect on the case.
Who is Justin W. Kenner?
In the XRP suit, Justin W According to what was reported, he carries a busy record of clash with SEC again in 2020. In 2022, the court ordered him to pay a penalty of $ 10.2 million, claiming that “Kener failed to register as a securities trader with SEC, or to connect with a registered merchant, when he bought and sold billions of newly released shares from Penny Stock from January 2015 to January 2018.”
Nino against Jamal
NYNU V Jamal is an emotional encryption journalist with three years of experience in Blockchain, Web3 and Fintech balls. She has created herself as an attractive and attractive voice in the coded currency and blocks. She added her experience as an assistant professor in English and literature to her endeavor to formulate well and accessible media content.
Responsibility: Is market research before investing in encrypted currencies? The author or post does not bear any responsibility for your personal financial loss.
partner: