The expert reveals obstacles to Ripple and SEC before the final decision

While XRP suit reaches its final stages, there are some loose parties that the parties are racing to link. Digital assets lawyer James Farrell notes that Ripple Labs will follow an indication of the future subscription procedures. However, the internal operations of the Securities and Stock Exchange Committee (SEC) may see that the loose parties become a complex problem for Ripple laboratories.
Rulgery is chasing the SEC settlement and an indication rule
According to Crypto James Farrell, Ripple and US SEC should avoid a set of obstacles to reach the final decision in the XRP suit. Farrell revealed via X post This Ripple Labs follows a settlement with the SEC while its scenes are on the ruling of a sign from Judge Torres.
The parties take a break from legal procedures after the US Court of Appeal granted a joint request to suspend the appeal. With the ends, wash their swords and head to the negotiating table, Farrell says Ripple tends to a settlement width.
Moreover, Ripple is expected to ask the provincial court to issue an indicator ruling, seeking Judge Torres to amend her ruling. Per Farrell, Ripple wants to adjust him to implement special sales for XRP before the date of the Ripple public subscription.
“Why do they want it? Because without that, the possibility of the public subscription in the next 3 years is the basis for zero,” Farrell said. “So, while the wonderful children are passing in public, Ripple cannot practically.”
A complex administrative process in the XRP suit
According to the legal expert, the Ripple process will include a settlement offer and a request for an indicator ruling. FARRELL notes that the legal Ripple team can submit both requests to SEC jointly or separately.
It indicates that the settlement is a low pending fruit of ripples, but the indicative judgment may be a complex problem for the parties in the XRP suit. If the Supreme Technology Council provides the Supreme Education Council, Ripple will have a request to Judge Torres, with an expert expecting a six -month timetable.
After its decision, the parties may go to the Court of Appeal where the appeal is still delighted and submit a voluntary separation. Farrell expects the operation in the Court of Appeal for one month.
If Judge Torres rejects a request for amendment of the upholstery, Farrell notes that the parties will return to the Court of Appeal with the argument related to the appeal that may extend until January 2027.
After stopping the legal procedures in the XRP suit, the analysis will be launched as a $ 2 analysis as a XRP price for an equivalent crowd.
Responsibility: Is market research before investing in encrypted currencies? The author or post does not bear any responsibility for your personal financial loss.
partner: