The defendant tried to use Amnesty International’s Avatar in a legal appeal. He did not work

One of the defendants at the New York Court of Appeal was criticized by a judge for using a personal photo of artificial intelligence to represent himself in a recent case.

The New York Court of Appeal faced an extraordinary situation in late March when Jerome Diwald, who represents himself in a conflict over employment, has introduced an incarnate image created from artificial intelligence. He appears.

It is the latest example of artificial intelligence tools that make its way to court halls.

Within seconds of the start of the video, Judge Sally Manzanit Daniels The name To stop, and ask if the Avatar is the lawyer of the case.

“I was born,” 74 -year -old Diwald answered, adding, “This is not a real person.”

The judge seemed to be upset, and he replied that “it was good to know that when you submitted your request,” it was said that the defendant appeared before the court and was able to verify the certificate in the past.

The judge added, “I cannot be misleading.”

I asked the defendant if he was suffering from a disease that prevented him from expressing before adding, “This courtroom will not use as a launch of your work,” then screaming, “Close that,” noting the video screen.

Diwald later apologized, explaining that he believed that AI Avatar would make his arguments more eloquence than he could.

Talk to Associated Press, Diwald He said Submit an application to the court to obtain permission to play a previously recorded video, then used San Francisco Tech to create Ai Avatar.

He originally tried to generate a digital copy for itself, but it was prevented from time restrictions before the session. “The court was really upset with that,” Diwald admitted, adding, “You have chewed well.”

Related to: Meta’s Llama 4 brings us back to “winning the artificial intelligence race” – David Sachs

Amnesty International enter the legal world

The accident highlights the increasing challenges as artificial intelligence enters the legal world.

In 2023, a New York lawyer was detonated for the martyrdom of Chatgpt in a legal summary as part of a lawsuit against a Colombian airline.

In March, Arizona’s Supreme Court began using two images created by artificial intelligence, similar to those used by Diwald in New York, to summarize the court’s rulings for the public.

In September, the US Federal Trade Committee has taken measures against companies that were involved in the misleading consumers using artificial intelligence, including a company that offered artificial intelligence lawyer.

magazine: “Chernobyl” needs to awaken people to the dangers