The long -term legal battle between SEC and Ripple has taken another dramatic turn. Judge Angia Torres, who was supervising the case, rejected a joint request from both Ripple and SEC who aims to conclude the case once and for all.
This last step means that the battle has not ended yet. The rejected deposit was supposed to aim to control the terms of the penalty against Ripple and then wipe the road to both sides to decline their calls. But Judge Torres did not have it.
Does XRP have legal clarity?
To add to the drama, there has been a new demand to carry out online tours indicating that “XRP has no legal clarity” and lacks institutional support. The post did not claim that there is no major CBDCS on XRPL, and only bitcoin is part of the US Reserve.
This did not sit well with the pro -attic of XRP Bill Morgan, who fired strongly. It was called “the biggest lie she saw in Crypto this year”, to remind everyone that Judge Torres has already ruled XRP himself is not safe. More importantly – SEC did not appeal this part of the decision.
When someone argued that the judge’s comments were only Decita (A legal term for observations is legally undisputed), Bill Morgan responded firmly, saying that even the colon provides a degree of legal clarity. He explained that the logic used by Judge Torres is a convincing authority in the court – and he said that no court found that XRP was safe, adding, “It has more clarity than bitcoin, which does not contain anything.”
What is the following for XRP?
Despite legal inscriptions, most experts believe that the final decision is still on the horizon. The rejected deposit does not affect the current legal clarity of XRP or stand, and while SEC and Ripple will have to reconsider the penalty talks, the main results of the case are still unchanged.
