Lumoz Raas to support RISC-V ZKEVM: Layer2 offers performance and expansion

background

Participant founder of Ethereum Vitalik Buterin recently Proposal Replace the current ETHEREUM virtual system (EVM) with the RISC-V. This proposal sparked a large-scale debate within the ETHEREUM community and the most prominent RISC-V in Blockchain space. In parallel, Lumoz Raas (Rollup as a service) announced its support for the RICEC -based ZKEVM solution, with the aim of providing higher performance and expansion to Layer2.

Evm has always been the essence of smart nodes functions, supporting a varied ecosystem of decentralized applications. However, with the development of Blockchain technology, the architectural restrictions of EVM are increasingly clear. As the structure of an open source instructions, RISC-V with openness, simplicity and ecological ecosystem-which makes it a strong candidate to reshape the smart contract implementation environment. By combining RISC-V and developing smart contracts, this innovation is not only improved performance and safety, but is a much greater access to the development of Blockchain.

Why do you choose RISC-V?

RISC-V is the structure of an open source instructions (ISA) has gained great attention to its standard design and its flexibility. Compared to traditional royal structures like X86 and ARM, RISC-V offers many main advantages:

• Open source and free of kings: There are no restrictions on patents, which greatly reduces development and publishing costs.
• Flexibility and expansion: supports allocated instructions groups, making them adaptable to the various needs of Blockchain systems.
• Performance improvement: its simplified design allows effective implementation, making it ideal for enhancing the performance of the smart nodes.

Vitalik suggested the use of RISC-V as the long-term implementation layer of ETHEREUM, with the aim of achieving a greater ability to expand and low network operational costs.

Evm restrictions

To understand the reason that RISC-V is a convincing alternative, it is important to first know the shortcomings of the ETHEREUM (EVM):

• Complex: Bytecode EVM symbol is complex and depends on the stacks, which reduces the efficiency of implementation.

• Expandable bottlenecks: do not support its multiple intention or a parallel account, which limits the ability to expand performance.

• Not to improve devices: due to the high level of abstraction, EVM cannot fully benefit from the capabilities of the devices.

These restrictions make EVM less convenient to support zero knowledge (ZKEVMS) and other advanced scaling solutions.

ZKEVM background and challenges

ZKEVM (Zero-Knowledge Machine Virtual Machine) is a virtual device that depends on zero knowledge proof techniques such as ZK-Snarks or ZK-Starks. Users can check the account results without detecting basic data. The primary goal of ZKEVM is to enhance the privacy of Blockchain systems and the ability to expand significantly through zero knowledge evidence.

ZKEVM technical challenges

1. High Guide: Zero-knowledge evidence requires evidence for all EVM instructions, usually used ZK-SNARKS or ZK-Starks. This imposes great demands on both the account and storage.
2. Adaptation issues: EVM was not originally designed with zero knowledge evidence in mind, which led to performance bottlenecks for current ZKEVM solutions.
3. Compatibility bodies: ZKEVMS must balance with compatibility with the ecosystem of the current smart nodes with improved performance.

Combine RIC-V with ZKEVM

RISC-V offers the perfect layer to find well-right devices for ZKEVM needs. Here are many technical points represented in the inclusion of RISC-V with ZKEVM:

1. The generation of more efficient proof

RISC-V Simplified Instructions make zero knowledge a more efficient generation. Compared to EVM, RISC-V Instructions is easier in analysis, and the registry-based architecture is more efficient than the EVM-based architecture. This greatly reduces computer expenses to generate evidence in ZKEVM.

2. Customized instructions groups

RIC-V standard design enables the creation of specialized instructions for ZKEVM. For example, the instructions designated for the limited field can be designed, which accelerates the main components of the ZK-SNARK or ZK-Stark, such as multi-border obligations and retail encryption functions.

3. The possibilities of accelerating devices

Thanks to its open source nature, RISC-V device sellers allows to provide a customer speed to ZKEVM, including:

• ASics Integrated Circles (ASICS): ASICS appointed ASics can implement zero knowledge of ZKEVM RISC-V.
• FPGA support: ZKEVM initial models with RISC-V on FPGAS allows rapid repetition and improvement.

RIC-V EVM design and implementation

To design and implement the RIC-V ZKEVM, the following main areas must be processed:

1. Building the basic components of RISC-V EVM
2. Development of the RISC-V group compatible with Blockchain
3. Improving performance and safety restrictions
4. Conduct measurement measurement and low -level performance analysis
5. Incorporation of RIC-V EVM dedicated into the Lumoz Raas environment
6. Implementation of Blockchain logic within the RIC-V frame
7. Standard against standard EVM

Support Lumoz Raas

As an innovator in Blockchain space, Lumoz Raas has announced its support for RISC-V, which allows developers to benefit from Rollup services more efficiently. Here are some possible effects of Lumoz support for RISC-V ZKEVM:

Impact on developers:

1. Increased development efficiency: By providing the pre-built ZKEVM RICEVM-VV units, developers can spread and test zero knowledge proof applications quickly.
2. Justice compatibility: LOMOZ tools include a smooth complementary for RISC-V ZKEVM with the current ethereum ecological system.

The importance of Rolub:

1. Rollups with a higher performance: RIC-V ZKEVM will greatly enhance the productivity of Rollups transactions.
2. Reduced operating costs: RISC-V and low licensing costs will reduce the operational costs of calm.

Technological view

The VITALIK and Lumoz proposal is an important turning point in Blockchain technology. RISC-V input does not provide new possibilities for ETHEREUM long-term development, but also provides a reference for technological development of other Blockchain platforms.

In the future, with the formation of RISC-V ZKEVM gradually, we may see the following trends:

1. The height of the ecosystems across the chain: RISC-V can enhance the inter-Blockchain platforms.
2. Deep integration of devices and Blockchain: The improvement of RISC-V devices will enhance the mathematical efficiency of Blockchain systems.
3. Violence Wide Privacy Dependence: ZKEVM solutions will improve the privacy of Blockchain applications and expansion.

conclusion

The RISC-V and ZKEVM mix is ​​a great innovation in Blockchain technology. Vitalik’s proposal not only indicates the future development of Ethereum, but also provides new ideas for the entire Blockchain industry. With the support of Lumoz Raas and the participation of more developers, we have all the reasons for the widespread adoption of RISC-V ZKEVM in the future.

The future of Blockchain is not only about the code; It lies in openness and cooperation in the technological ecosystem. The arrival of the RIC-V ZKEVM may appear in a completely new era of technology.