The encryption community is still concerned about a possible delay in resolving the lawsuit at XRP, despite the position of the Securities and Stock Exchange Committee (SEC). While many believe that the complications surrounding the case can delay the settlement, experts like Farid Risboli consider it unnecessary. Rispoli believes that the separation of the Ripple VS SEC case is simple and possible.
With the division of experts on the possibility of settling a ripple lawsuit, society remains curious. This contrast in the opinions of experts confirms the uncertainty surrounding the outcome of the lawsuit.
Is delaying SEC to settle the XRP case unnecessary?
In a modern x publication, legal expert Farid Reesboli rejected discussions On the complications surrounding the XRP case. While society expects a possible delay in settling the case, Rispoli stated that the decision is simple and possible. By treating SEC excuses as coward, Rispoli edifice,
It is clear that the absence of Paul Atkins did not worry about the current 3 -member SEC committee on major litigation issues. The best of my guess is that, given the referee of $ 125 million, this is real money that does not want Uyeda and Pierce responsible for the amendment. It is not a great excuse (cheese appears), but it is logical. The case ended regardless, whether now or within a few months.
Miscellaneous, RISPOLI is sure to settle the XRP suit is just around the corner, although concerns about others about possible delay. Something indicates that there is no new penalty at SEC Paul Atkins and Judge Angia Torres worth $ 125 million against Ripple as major obstacles. However, Rispoli rejects these concerns as unfounded.
The lawyer says that the case of ripple versus SEC has ended
RISPOLI proposes a direct decision to the Ceremile state against SEC, which shows a virtual scenario as Ripple and SEC are mutual mutual to drop their appeal. According to Rispoli, this may include Ripple to give up a $ 125 million penalty, which effectively ends the lawsuit. He added that dropping the appeal means that Ripple abandons its demand that the penalty for 125 million dollars is excessive, which makes the amount due.
It is worth noting that this simple solution contradicts the complex negotiations expected by experts such as metalawman, who highlighted the complexities of the issue. According to Metalawman, the Ripple lawsuit will not find its end until after the conclusions of a series of lawsuits, including Gemini, Kaken and Binance.
The unveiling of a very unlikely position
When Rispoli presented an open discussion on XRP suit, an investor wanted to know whether Ripple could still challenge the judgment after SEC withdraw. In detail, the investor asked whether the situation is possible as Ripple pays a $ 125 million penalty, and SEC withdraws his appeal, but ripples pressures his appeal.
However, Rispoli finds the situation very impossible with the chance of 0 %. According to him, Ripple or SEC will not resume them while allowing the other to go forward. It defines these procedures as an exclusive mutual as it cannot occur together.
Is the decision of an imminent rippral lawsuit?
The inability to predict the Crypto market extends to industry events, making it difficult to predict the outcome of the XRP suit. Despite the various opinions of experts and analyzes, the result of the Ripple VS SEC case is still unconfirmed.
The recent SEC settlements have been born with Coinbase and Robinhood optimism, but the fate of Ripple is suspended in the balance. However, the SEC position is increasingly favorable on ETFS XRP is a confidence enhanced.
Nino against Jamal
NYNU V Jamal is an emotional encryption journalist with three years of experience in Blockchain, Web3 and Fintech balls. She has created herself as an attractive and attractive voice in the coded currency and blocks. She added her experience as an assistant professor in English and literature to her endeavor to formulate well and accessible media content.
Responsibility: Is market research before investing in encrypted currencies? The author or post does not bear any responsibility for your personal financial loss.
partner: