It is possible that the absence of gender bias in NFT prices will reflect the balanced population composition for investors
Links table
Summary and one introduction
2 methodology
3 results
3.1 Cryptopank
3.2 Total NFT market
4 discussion
5. Conclusion/thanks and appreciation/references
extension
A.1 Implementation details
A2 Deta Deta Information
4. Discussion
We seek to determine the mechanisms that produce different biases and the cause of racist prejudice, not a bias on the basis of sex in NFTS prices. Most NFTS in the market, especially those with sex and race features, represent symbolic images. NFTS, especially those expensive such as Cryptopungs, can be used as a picture of the profile, and therefore people may prefer NFTS that look similar to them. Thus we believe that the population composition of NFT investors is the mechanisms that produce these biases.
According to Statistica data [2] [4]Among the age group (18-34) that has the greatest interest in non-replaceable symbols, men and women have non-replaceable symbols equally, with men 24% and 21% women of the total number of investors. Consequently, the fact that we do not notice the gender bias in NFT prices may be due to almost a balance of investors between the sexes.
However, the distribution of a NFT buyer may be deviant in white, which explains the existence of racial bias. Using Google’s research as an indication of the size of NFT investors in an area, we have found in the past five years that the term “NFT” was the most searched in East Asia and North America and less research in Africa and India. Consequently, more people with light skin are interested in NFTS compared to people with dark skin, and this may be the reason for increasing demand for light -skinned NFTS. The full map of Google Sections can be found in Figure 7 in the A.3 Appendix.
