Is the hypothesis that artificial intelligence can kill Bitcoin correct?

Recently, there has been a fictional hypothesis that revolves that artificial intelligence (AI) may have the ability to do so Bitcoin killed.
This is a purely speculation hypothesis, and this means that it is not based on concrete evidence but only on assumptions, which may be specifically circulated due to the recent uproar about artificial intelligence.
The hypothesis of the clash between artificial intelligence and bitcoin
This hypothesis is based on a concept AI and bitcoin (or cryptocurrencies) can contradict.
It is clear that it is not about competing with each other, since they are completely different techniques that do different things, but about the possible interventions of the first in the second.
In particular, one aspect of the potential conflict is His identity is not disclosedGiven that in reality artificial intelligence can help track unknown transactions on public edges such as those in Bitcoin.
Another is those related to the potential competition of the classic currency Fiat against Bitcoin, once the benefit of not detecting its identity significantly.
Finally, there is those related to the possibility of enabling artificial intelligence to create more efficient central payment systems than current systems, capable of competing with Bitcoin.
Well, all these three potential contradictions may have little impact on Bitcoin’s success, given that the majority of their use is not affected by these aspects.
Crypto and Bitcoin: Reducing the lack of disclosure of his identity with artificial intelligence
In fact, it is completely possible to make artificial intelligence Many easier to track transactions on the seriesAlthough it is unknown.
To say the truth, this can help until the spread of bitcoin, rather than hindering it, because it will make it increasingly compatible or near the laws of different countries.
For example, if you examine trading sizes, in order to talk about concrete things and not only purely virtual assumptions, I immediately noticed that the vast majority of encryption trading units occur on central platforms (exchanges) that require KYC (i.e. identification).
In other words, the vast majority of trades in BTC and the cryptocurrencies do not occur anonymously, even if they are not registered on General Blockchain.
Moreover, even when the symbols are transferred from a Plastic with kycWith unknown transactions on the chain, it is very easy to follow today, even without the need to resort to artificial intelligence.
Therefore, artificial intelligence can reduce the identity of transactions on the chain, but this instead of the unpleasant bitcoin currency you can prefer. Also because the big institutional investors, who are moving huge sums, are clearly not unidentified, and they will never do so.
Fiat currency competition
Instead, the idea that the Fiat currencies can compete with bitcoin is completely wrong.
In fact, Bitcoin is not used as a method of exchange, so it is not used in competition with Fiat currencies.
Moreover, Fiat currencies are inflationary because the central banks they export and manage their monetary policy have a commitment to amplify them.
Bitcoin is exactly the opposite, which means that it tends to become a contraction over the decades, to the extent that as a exchange currency will be used less and less, because it is much less useful than the Fiat currencies from this point of view. Instead, it will be used more and more, mainly in the financial markets, as a form of hedging against any very wide monetary policies for central banks.
It should not be forgotten that it is very common for central banks to choose excessively excessive monetary policies, and the currency they issue in any way cannot be used as a substitute for bitcoin from this point of view. In fact, those very wide monetary policies that help the BTC value to grow, at the same time eventually reducing the real value of the Fiat currency, which thus acts in the opposite way to Bitcoin in such contexts.
Improving payment systems
Specifically because Bitcoin is not a good transaction currency, improving Fiat payment systems will not negatively affect their use in financial markets as a hedge against excessive monetary policies of central banks.
In fact, to say the truth, this can help even exchange it by expanding the scope of platforms that allow bitcoin circulation in Fiat, and vice versa.
Even if the potential Bitcoin currencies are considered instead of potential currencies, at the present time, there are already hundreds, if not thousands, and no even seems to be able to act as a better hedging against extensively excessive monetary policies.
Bitcoin intelligence will help
In light of all this, the hypothesis that artificial intelligence can have the ability to kill Bitcoin today, it appears to be a pure imagination, and lacks any imagination.
On the contrary, from a more accurate and in -depth analysis, it appears clearly that the use of artificial intelligence can help in making bitcoin more acceptable in the traditional financial system, even more than it is now.
The fact that it is not used as a currency for payments is now not related to its process, because it has found another use, very important and increasingly spread, as its only real competitor is gold, or rather financial derivatives of gold.
AI Bitcoin can help become increasingly acceptable in the financial markets, and may be almost accepted like gold.
However, it will never compete with gold, because although the latter remains, and it may remain always, the assets that risk, Bitcoin is, and perhaps always, one of the assets of risks, which means greater volatility and greater risks to investors, but also greater possible gains.