IO’s block supplies to Jupiter Magnet: What we know and what we do

All, there is a qualitative consistent understanding of how to feed IO materials from IO and is distributed to the Jovian system for stable conditions, however, we find that it is currently not understood how IO’s losing from IO to supply Torus can change significantly and explain the noticeable changes in Torus Plasma and neutral pills. It is difficult to reconcile the hypothesis of a significant increase in the loss of mass from IO with the current understanding of the atmosphere and the escape from it. In the 3.1 and 3.2 parts, we summarize our understanding of the stable conditions, based on the current knowledge of the various parts mentioned in Section 2. In 3.3 we offer an overview of transient events reported from the magnetic cover that is usually interpreted as IO. Then we offer warnings about the system communications in the 3.4 section.

There is a general consensus on how to transfer the bulk mass in IO-Jupiter in light of the normal circumstances. “Ordinary Conditions” here refers to stable Torus as noted by fixed emissions and measurements on the site over several weeks to months (Jupiter’s monitoring season is about 6-8 months per year for observations related to the ground) otherwise any unusual conditions are observed in the magnetic cover, such as the increase in neutral dogs or nebula.

The materials are expelled from the volcanic sites from the surface under the surface, providing flying materials to the atmosphere and the surface. Surface frost deposits (50 % – 80 % of the atmosphere source) and direct retail in volcanic sites (20 % – 50 % of the atmosphere) maintains the IO atmosphere. The atmosphere reveals strong differences in the side density and federations, but it appears to have a stable SO2 abundance in Dayside (Section 2.2). Despite the potentially variable volcanic mobility, it is possible that the stability of the atmosphere will be maintained through the effects of the porous fracture (which maintains the balance of steam pressure) and the potential mutual effects between excessive and smiling gases. The SO2 atmosphere is then eroded mainly from the interaction with the surrounding plasma. This creates new Torus ions locally in IO (approximately 200-300 kg/s) and comes out of the atomic and molecular neutral in the neutral clouds in the IO orbit and near the orbit of IO (later in Torus, which led to the provision of fresh Torus ions) and in the extended neutral b in (not added to Plasma Torus), see section 2.4. All other operations that allow the flying to escape from IO and add them to neutral clouds or at least the plasma -lower arrangement of size, and therefore it is expected that only secondary contributions to providing new ions in Torus (section 2.3, table 1).

The ionization of the electron of the neutral neutral gases is the main production of the exported plasma in the plasma (Section 2.5). Finally, there is a plasma net transfer (on a time scale between 10 and 60 days, section 2.6 and table 2), which nourishes the genetic material IO in the outer Torus and then the plasma sheet, which extends far to magnetic. In the radiological distance where the primary momentum is required to maintain the encouragement of plasma, the field currents lead to energy transfers along the magnetic field lines, causing the main emissions in Aurora in Jupiter (Section 2.7).

Possible positive feedback is likely to be on IO’s block supplies, which is expected that the loss depends on the Torus plasma density (by colliding with plasma with the atmosphere and neutral clouds) through limited mechanisms or several mechanisms. It turns out that external transport is faster during times of reinforced Torus density that indicates that the limited mechanism in the loss is effective (Section 2.6). The conversion of the plasma mentioned due to the reaction of the plasma and pepper can work as an additional budget agent by reducing the width, although simulations only indicate simple effects (section 2.4).

Although it is still completely incomprehensible to the operations that drive mass transport through the magnetic cover, there is a relatively consistent image of mass flows, paths and time standards for the transportation of the mass in the IO-Jupiter system of stable conditions. The mechanisms (mechanisms) maintain stability or stability maintain the stability of Torus density and should make them at least simple changes in IO.

The mass rate was derived ~ 1 ton/s by Broadfoot et al. 1979 based on the assumption that the energy it radiated in the maximum UV (EUV) and UV (FUV), the energy inputs were balanced from capturing the fresh product ion, which is closed in the flow of local laid plasma and to the SICO movement in the local flow speed. Consequently, the rate of neutral (kilograms/s or molecules/) was removed by interacting with the IO plasma (primarily ionization and electron ionization and the exchange of the shipment) from neutral clouds and Corona IO. In modeling papers, it is called the neutral source rate or the strength of the neutral source (for example, Delamere et al. 2004).

Electronic insignificance of neutral effects provides an additional new plasma to Torus without plasma losses in the same processes. This is thus a large net download from Torus. Exchange leads to a new slow ion and turns the “old” torus ion into a fast neutral that leaves the system. Each of the insults and the exchange of graphics contributes to energy saving to operate Torus UV emissions and maintain Torus Ion and Electron temperatures. (Hot electrons also have a major contribution to the power inputs in Torus, see section 2.6.)

In the balance, the neutral that is removed from the neutral clouds from IO must be re -applied. To contribute to neutral clouds, neutrals from IO must reach enough speed to overcome IO’s attractiveness and at least reach the hill field, where particles can continue in the orbits associated with the buyer. On the surface, this speed is 2.33 km/s. Escape to infinity, the speed of escape is 2.56 km/s. The neutrals are provided at low speeds, as Corona is provided with IO. The neutrals are removed at speeds faster than the speed of escape from Jovian in the orbit of IO (25 km/s in the reference frame of Jupiter, while IO’s tropical speed is about 17 km/s) escape from IO system on excessive tracks and does not provide neutral for neutral spoils or Plasma Torus. Instead, it contributes to the formation of the nebula. In addition, some radial materials are likely to migrate inward (also form cold topus).

Consequently, the ecclesiastical rate (or the neutral source rate) of the plasma is not equal to the loss of the mass from IO, but instead it represents a minimum of the total neutral loss and the energy needed to support the UV power that Torus radiates.