Who controls the narration? When the white dictates social change

Links table

Abstract and 1 introduction

2. Early life

3. White as an institution

4. The triple threat

5. Academic farms field

6. The future is black women

7. Imagination as a tool

8. Imagination through research

9. Imagination by playing

10. Cooperation as an imagination

11. Conclusions and references

3. White as an institution

“Dominating cultures depend on the cultivation of fear as a way to ensure obedience”–Bell hooks (2000)

Before entering the academic circles, I spent the first decade of puberty at work in various social services organizations for a series of non -profit companies and thought tanks. Although organizations were different in different ways, what was consistent in institutions is the organizational structure, expectations, implicit punishment, and the silence of those who failed to work within the limits of domination ideologies such as whiteness, colonialism and patriarchs. Melendez et al. (2023) POSIT, “Dommerships in the root of colonialism at racist levels are included in all US institutions.” Each institution had a commitment to social justice and liberation for all, however they had inevitably preserving power by implementing the policies designed to protect domination by mediating the whiteness. Hess (2007) refers to the work of whiteness as “white legends” and says that it works as a dissonance between reality and what is based on a socially fake. Sweat is not real. It was built. White is not real. It was also built. In some way, there is a lack of white interrogation as a building that ultimately puts the whiteness as natural and natural, which leads to its ability to control. The whiteness was created to establish the duo that we see today by formulating the hierarchical sequence of power, where the upper part of the hierarchical sequence represents strength and concession, and includes the lower part of the hierarchical sequence of black control, and it is a basis for exploitation. At the end of the hierarchical sequence framework, bilateral structures for structural and methodological inequality functions. At one end of the spectrum, there is white, with strength, and the other party is anti -black, which is the anchor of persecution. Through these two structures, inequality is designed and currently works as a root of the US economy. The economy that we have today is the result of racist colonialism, seizures and money that allows these organizations to work that cannot be separated. Therefore, the root of money is investing to start their work at least twice: the capital from the land stolen from the indigenous indigenous people and the stolen workers of the slave blacks.

My understanding of the history of institutional investment is what I brought to every position in which I worked. I work as if all executives and managers who do inequality are clear about the deliberate design of our economy and inequality. She worked in the fields of social welfare and social services. Understanding the construction of the American economy is related to the field of social welfare. My experience as a young professional during the first decade of work in non -profit organizations and intellectual tanks was a form of psychological abuse. In my experience, the white appeared in ways that made me wonder about my reality. For example, from 2017 to 2020, she worked as a member of the Board of Directors in small non -profit concerns and raised fears that the leadership did not reflect the society that is presented. I decided to resign three years after waiting for the promises of shares. In the first year of my state, I promised as a member of the Board of Directors that the current director of the organization, who coincided with being a white woman who was not from society but obtained a doctorate degree. In social work, he will not become the organization’s executive. She promised by the founder, who was also a white woman, that the Board of Directors employed a community to lead the organization. Three years later, he became the executive director, and the justification was “She deserves the job after all her hard work.”. The whiteness builds the game and then dictates the rules of engagement so that the result can be in its favor. Based on my resignation, one of the founders, who believed that at that time I was a friend, answered my resignation and mentioned, “I had frankly the atmosphere that did not want to succeed, and this was the result that you could be able to use as a story in your career.”. This statement was supposed to question my intentions of resignation; He made me almost ask me to doubt my reality and my decision so that I could refer to the tangible material truth: the CEO did not represent society as I promised. The intention for the effect is the result of the white. Today, in 2024, the executive director has not changed, and now supervises more than eight black and Latin employees; All children who serve them are black and Latin, and not a single community has a job within the organization. White literally benefits from the damage and marginalization of society when the white is the original and useful designer of their difficulties. This is modern colonialism. Nearly seven years, the leadership remained the same. I made the right decision. White is entitled

The cycle and white control continued with climbing the career ladder. My work in the National Research Research Tank was as a director of politics and advocacy was my entry into the world of treacherous knowledge production. Language is vital in my work as a researcher for social policy, researcher and practitioner. Acknowledging all parts of history so that the future scientists and practitioners have what they need to build a scholarship in the future is necessary. As an emerging researcher, I think it is my duty to be honest in a scholarship on inequality. Although this desire may seem clear, it is not practiced by all scientists and practitioners. There is a dominant and deliberate narration framing in both the general and private scholarship that focuses on white. White gets the story from her point of view. Language control is one of the basic functions of whiteness. I suffered directly from controlling the language, and extracted the skill of “best practices” while working in a national research tank. While formulating a report on the ethnic wealth gap, I was told that I could not use the term “black fight” in my writing. When I asked the reason, I was told, “The language is very strong” and “it contradicts the best communication practices.” At that time, my manager was a white woman with experience in working in the work of wealth for “women” (not the work of gender wealth) and a master’s degree in political economy. At that time, I was in my fourth year of doctoral studies, with two degrees of masters and more than fifteen years of work experience. I am also a black woman who studied critical sweat grant for a decade. I was employed to work at the national level of the center and sex in the work of wealth in the institution. As an emerging black feminist scientist, I understood that the words are important. I called for the term and requested a description of our policies and definitions of a “strong language”. I argued that there is a clear distinction between racism and anti -black racism. My manager told me at the time that I am “new” for this scene, and I advise me to listen more before I try to perform “new things”. As a black woman who completes the peripheral PhD with more than fifteen years of official higher education, I was not an expert sufficiently by managers to use the terms that I considered appropriate or led our narrative work without their consent and comfort in the language. This is just one example between how white maintains itself by spreading lies to protect its existence.