Humans will be the head of Amnesty International, says the Amnesty International scientist in Mita says

• It is usually understood artificial cancellation as artificial intelligence systems more advanced than human thinking.
• Yan Lacon, the chief scientist of Amnesty International in Meta, says people will remain a president in artificial intelligence.
• He said to be that he does not believe in a “disaster scenario” in which AI’s artificial intelligence runs.

Superinteigence will come, but it will not replace humans – Now, at least – AI, President of Amnesty International, said.

Yan Lacon, the best artificial intelligence in Meta, said on Tuesday during the NVIDIA GTC conference that artificial intelligence could replace people, but stabbed whether humans would allow this to happen. He was responding to a comment made by the chief scientist in Nafidia Bill Daly, who said during their conversation, “Amnesty International does not replace people, it mainly gives them energy tools.”

“Well, it may be the case at some point, but I don’t think people will go to this, right,” he said to be to be. “I mainly mean our relationship with future AI systems, including excellent cancellation, is that we will be their boss. We will get employees of people working in the field of supercoming activities, and beautiful people for us. I don’t know about you, but I love working with people more intelligent than me. It’s the greatest thing in the world.”

The leaders of the artificial intelligence industry, including the Sam Taman from Openai and Xai’s Elon Musk, often constitutes the appearance of the most intelligent artificial intelligence system of humans-as a note from the horizon of the event for humanity, where scientific innovation can flourish but may also lead to an event at the level of extinction.

Lecun has previously dumped the cold water on the Resurrection Day caused by artificial intelligence.

In the publication of X of 2024, Lecun described the idea of ​​the “Tropy/Clay/Clay” and “ridiculous scenario that fly in the face of everything we know about how things work.”

He wrote in The Post: “The appearance of the excellent cancellation will not be an event,” he wrote in The Post. “We have nothing close to a plan for distinguished systems today. At some point, we will reach a structure that can take us there.”

Lecun and Meta spokesperson did not respond to the comment.

The chief artificial intelligence scientist said during the NVIDIA conference that there are risks of misuse and the unreliable AI – but the solution is “Amnesty International.”

“The reform for this is better than artificial intelligence. It may be the systems that have a meaningful meaning, the ability to think and verify whether the answers are correct, and the reliability of its own answers that are not the issue is currently.” “But the disaster scenario, frankly, I do not believe in that.”