Here is the place where all players stand in the Battle of Trump-Biglaw

President Donald Trump fluctuated in major law firms during the past month, which asked for reviews of government contracts and cancel security permits for some company employees.

Some have concluded deals with the president, while others refuse to throw the towel.

Trump has accused the major law firms – including Paul Weiss, Birkins Koy, Covengtton and Burling, among others – from the weapon of the judicial system. Its orders, in turn, have made it difficult for companies to continue to do business as usual. Many of them claimed in the lawsuits that executive orders aim to recover freedom of expression and deterish customers from dealing with companies.

He summoned a series of law firms believed to have erred in some capabilities, or worked with his political opponents, or he had diversity initiatives that contradict his efforts to combat Dei.

Moreover, Trump ordered instructions from Public Prosecutor Bam Bondi to identify companies that have “trivial” issues against the administration so that they can be targeted for more executive procedures.

Whether they are on ropes or down for counting, here are the best companies that Trump takes, in addition to taking a look at the place where the legal process stands.

Paul Weiss

Earlier in March, Trump released Executive order The prominent law firm in New York City Paul Weiss, where he resides against lawyer Mark Boumieneranz and tightened what he said was “illegal discrimination” of diversification, fairness and integration in the company.

Bumiranz Paul Weiss had previously left to help the Public Prosecutor’s Office in Manhattan, where he achieved Trump’s financial resources. When Pomeranz resigned as a special lawyer for the region in February 2022, he wrote in a departure letter that he believed Trump was “guilty of many violations of felony.”

In the matter, Trump sought to cancel security permits and reach government buildings for the company’s lawyers. This full guidance can also include federal courts, a scenario that will be harmful to the company’s work.

However, after only a few days, Trump canceled the executive order and announced an agreement with Paul Weiss Carb Carb. Trump said the company will save $ 40 million in free work for the reasons supported by the administration and end its DEI policies.

KARP received a pile of criticism, with a lot of question why Paul Weiss did not challenge Trump. In an email to the company’s lawyer, he said there was a desire from the beginning to challenge the direction. In the same email, Carb argued that even if Paul Weiss won the court, he would become “unwanted” with the White House Trump, which may push a wave of customers to turn into other companies and then threaten the company’s authority.

“It is very likely that our company is able to survive in a long dispute with the administration,” Carb wrote in the email.

Perkins Koy

In early March, Trump targeted the law firm Perkins KoyIssuing an executive order to suspend security permits for the company’s lawyer and criticize its diversity policies and inclusion.

In the arrangement, Trump called what he said was “the uncle and dangerous activity of the company.”

In his order, the President indicated that the company represents the former minister of state Hillary Clinton – his rival in the 2016 presidential election – during the troubled campaign for that year.

However, Perkins Koy was struck, lifting a suit Against the management of procedures that said, “violating the basic constitutional rights, including the rights of freedom of expression and legal procedures.”

“At the heart of the matter, there is an illegal attack on the freedom of all Americans in choosing a lawyer to choose them without fear of revenge or punishment from the government,” Bill Malley, Managing Director of Berkens Koi, said in a statement in March. “We had to take this measure to protect our company and customers.”

The next day to lift Perkins Coie his bid, a federal judge agreed to prevent part of the president’s executive order temporarily.

Perkins Koy said, in a statement, that the ruling was “a first important step in ensuring that this non -constitutional executive order was not implemented.”

Covington & Burling Llp

Trump signed in late February a note To assess federal contracts and direct the suspension of security permits for some employees at Covington & Burling, a law firm, based in the capital, known for its work to combat monopoly.

The president said in the memo that he commented on the permits of individuals who advised former Special Adviser Jacques Smith.

Smith brought two federal issues against Trump – one of which is to interfere in the elections in the 2020 presidential elections and the other to keep the classified documents – but both were dropped after the president won his re -election in a second state in November 2024.

In the memo, Trump went after the individuals who said they were “involved in the weapon of the government” and appointed Peter Kosky, a lawyer in Kovington representing Smith.

A spokesman for Covengtton said earlier in March that he was Smith in an “individual” ability.

“We recently agreed to represent Jacques Smith when it became clear that it will become the subject of a government investigation,” a spokesman said in a statement. “We look forward to defending the interests of Mr. Smith and appreciate the confidence he put in us to do so.”

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

Skadden concluded a deal with Trump, behaving before being distinguished on any executive orders. Trump announced on Friday that the company promised to provide $ 100 million in the legal services to the total “for reasons that raise the support of the president and Skadden”.

Trump said Scaddin also confirmed her commitment to merit and retaining employees. The company also agreed that it will refrain from engaging in “illegal discrimination”, according to a copy of the agreement that Trump participated in the social truth.

In a statement, Jeremy London, CEO of Skadden, said that the company is “proactively involved” with the administration to reach the agreement.

“We firmly believe that this result is in the interest of our customers, our employees and our company,” London said.

Speaking from the White House, Trump referred to the deal as a “main settlement”.

Inside the company, some colleagues and employees expressed their frustration with the deal, describing it as the beginning of the end to Skadden.

In the weeks before the agreement, Rachel Cohen, Scotter’s colleague, publicly, and distributed an open letter among colleagues in major companies to their employers of what she described as a failure to face management attacks.

After announcing the deal, another employee, Brenna Frey, also resigned, publicly In an advertisement for LinkedIn.

Elias Lu Group

Follow the head of the Elias Group if a different approach after the administration targeted him.

Trump appointed Elias Group of Law in a “trivial” claim note, entitled “Preventing violations of the legal system and the federal court.”

He claimed that the law firm “participated in depth in establishing a” false “file by a foreign citizen designed to provide a fraudulent basis for federal law enforcement to investigate a presidential candidate in order to change the results of the presidential elections.”

The memo continued that the company “intentionally sought to hide the role of his client – the presidential candidate Hillary Clinton failed – in the file.”

He said that Mark Elias, the lawyer for the democratic elections that established the group and its heads, issued a statement swinging in Trump, whose actions are targeting “every lawyer and lawyer dares to challenge his assault on the rule of law.”

“President Trump’s goal is clear,” Elias said in the statement. “He wants the lawyers and lawyers to give up and overcome anyone so that no one leaves to oppose his administration in court.”

Adding that American democracy is in a state of “danger”, Elias said that his legal office will not be proven.

“The Elias group will not be deterred from the fight for democracy in the court,” he said. “There will be no negotiation with this White House about the customers we represent or the lawsuits that we bring on their behalf.”

Jenner & Block

Trump signed an order to name Jenner & Block on Tuesday, which canceled the security statements from the company’s lawyer and ordered the company’s contracts to review with the federal government.

Trump Andrew Weissman, a former Jenner’s lawyer, has identified Trump of building his career about “the government of weapons and abuse of power.” Wessman was the main prosecutor of the Robert Muller’s private advisor office, who was investigated in the 2016 Trump presidential campaign and her relations with Russia.

Jenner issued a statement called “an unconstitutional executive order that has already been announced by a federal court.”

The statement from Jenner said: “We are still focusing on serving and protecting the interests of our customers with dedication, integrity and experiences that have identified our company for more than a hundred years and will follow all the appropriate treatments.”

Jenner also fought with a lawsuit on Friday. The company is represented by Cooley LLP, a liberal tendencies that rented lawyers from democratic departments.

On Friday, Judge John de Pitts issued a temporary temporary temporary matter for the Trump administration to prevent action against Jenner.

After the verdict, Jenner said in a statement that it carries “there is no legal weight.”

“We will continue to do what we have always done,” the company said.

Wille Suhail

The Trump administration also targeted Wilmeerhale, who used Muller and other lawyers who worked with the Ministry of Justice to investigate relations between Russia and the Trump campaign for 2016.

On Thursday, Trump signed an executive order that suspended security permits for Wilmeerhale employees and limited their arrival at federal buildings. It also canceled the contracts of the Welteroal government to engage in “party representations to achieve political goals” and “efforts to discriminate on the basis of race.”

Unlike other companies that signed with the president, Welterloul has filed a lawsuit.

The company rented Paul Clement, the conservative legal star of Clement and Murphy, to respond to the Trump administration.

“This lawsuit is very important to prove the first amendment, our hostile justice system, and the rule of law,” Clement said in a statement.

On Friday afternoon, Judge Richard Leon from the US District Court of Colombia County Applicated approved a temporary restriction order to stop the executive procedures against Welteral.

“There is no doubt that this revenge procedure calms the discourse and legal call, or that it is qualified as a constitutional harm,” Leon wrote.

A spokesman for Welterohal described the executive order unconstitutional and praised the “quick work” of the court.