How the pattern of gods and perspective affect your VR experience

Links table

Abstract and 1 introduction

2 Related Work and 2.1 Virtual Avatar

2.2 The cloud depicting points

3 3.1 test design and preparation

3.2 User representations

3.3 methodology

3.4 virtual environment and 3.5 description tasks

3.6 questionnaires and 3.7 participants

4 Results and discussion, 4.1 user preferences

4.2 Task performance

4.3 Discussion

5 conclusions and references

5 conclusions

The use of self -installed offers is presented to the user, causing a decrease in the feeling of existence in the virtual reality session. A way to overcome this problem is the use of self -made spies that improve the presence and generally estimate the distance in the VR settings. Some factors that can affect the feeling of embodiment are realism and perspective that is seen on the Avatar (in the perspective of the first or third person). The realism of the avatar is affected by the steady valley, which also affects the self -spray. Although the effects of realism and perspective have not been fully taught in literature when it comes to self -deities. Because we used three different representations that differ realistic in both perspectives (1PP and 3PP) after the impact of the iconic valley, ranging from a summary to realistic representation. For realistic representation, we used the avatar of the magic point, which uses depth advisors at affordable prices to draw real user information in a self -enhanced user within the virtual environment. To evaluate each group of acting and perspective groups, we have chosen natural tasks such as walking while avoiding obstacles and arresting the things that were thrown.

As a result of statistical analysis, discussion and evaluation of the results, we propose the following guidelines related to the body’s representation and the camera perspective of the hypothetical reality applications incarnate:

• UNCANNY Valley effect is more prevalent on the perspective of the third person, and affects the time efficiency of mobility tasks.

• From the perspective of the first person (1PP), the effect of the UNCANNY valley is observed only on the tasks that need a higher sensation of embodiment (such as the tasks based on the use).

• To avoid the impact of the UNCANNY Valley, one should use either a simplified (abstract) representation or realistic representation (cloud) for the participant.

• The use of a more realistic representation (the cloud point) and the perspective (1PP) can lead to faster implementation times, but the low effectiveness of carrying out tasks.

• The perspective of the third person is recommended when spatial awareness at the level of horizontal movement, with a simple advantage when using a realistic representation.

• Avoid obstacles and access to animated organisms when using realistic representation due to the blockage created by the richest acting.

• Users’ sense of balance is negatively affected by a third perspective.

• Reflex tasks have better performance when using the first person’s perspective.

However, we were unable to clarify some of the aspects that were investigated in this study. They avoid obstacles in the vertical level, and how the estimation of the bad distance can affect these tasks, and if the body’s representation has any effect on this issue. Also, the UNCANNY Valley effect is observed on Reflex tasks, but it requires more evaluation using different stimuli.

To move forward, you should consider different tasks for the same views and bridges, such as cooperation between different users, social environments and communicative tasks.

Reference

[1] M. Alexa, J Computing and offering points score. Visualization and computer graphics, IEEE transactions, 9 (1): 3-15, January 2003.

[2] D. Bonatto, S. Rogge, A. Schenkel, R. Ercek, and G. Lafruit. Actual time exploration to provide the cloud for natural scenes in virtual reality. In 2016, the International Conference on 3D Photography (IC3D), pages 1-7, December 2016.

[3] M. Botsch, A. Hornung, M. Zwicker, and L. Kobbelt. The spread of high -quality surface on the graphics processing units today. In M. Alexa, S. Rusinkewicz, M. Pauly and M. Zwicker, Editors, EURGRADICS seminar on the drawings based on the point (2005). Eurogradics Association, 2005.

[4] M. Botsch, A. WIIRATANAYA, and L. Kobbelt. High quality offer for engineering is to take samples from point. In the incidents of the thirteenth euroggrics workshop on presentation, EGRW ’02, pages 53-64, AIRE-Laville, Switzerland, Switzerland, 2002.

[5] M. BOTVINICK, J. Cohen, et al. Every hands’ do not feel the eyes that you see. Nature, 391 (6669): 756–756, 1998.

[6] R. Boulic, D. MAUPU, and D. Thaalmann. On the scaling strategies to control the full position of the body on virtual models. Interaction with computers, 21 (1): 11-25, 2009.

[7] HG Debarba, E. Molla, B. Herbelin, and R. Boulic. Description of the embodied reaction in the views of the first and third person. In 3D user interfaces (3dui), IEEE 2015 seminar, pages 67-72. IEEE, 2015.

[8] M. Dou, S. Khamis, Y. Degtyarev, P. Davidson, SR Fanello, A. Kowdle, So Escolano, C. Rhemann, D. Kim, J Fusion4D: Real time performance performance for difficult scenes. ACM Trans. The graph. , 35 (4): 114: 1-114: 13, July 2016.

[9] Hh Ehrsson. Experimental induction of experiments outside the body. Science, 317 (5841): 1048-1048, 2007.

[10] R. Fabio and others. From the cloud point to the surface: the problem of modeling and perception. International Archives for Photography Sciences, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 34 (5): W10 – W10, 2003.

[11] M. Gopi, S. Krishnan and C. Silva. Reconstruction of the surface on the basis of low -dimensional DELAUNay trilogy. Computer drawings forum, 19 (3): 467–478, 2000.

[12] M. Gopi, S. Krishnan, and CT Silva. Reconstruction of the surface on the basis of low -dimensional DELAUNay trilogy. In the Computer Drawings Forum, Volume 19, Pages 467-478, 2000.

[13] V. Interrante, B. Ries, and L. Anderson. Imagine the distance in the overwhelming virtual environments, reconsider. At IEEE (VR 2006), pages 3-10. IEEE, 2006.

[14] S. Katz, A. Tal, and R. Basri. The direct vision of points groups. ACM Trans. The graph, 26 (3), July 2007.

[15] M. Kazhdan, M. Bolitho, and H. Hoppe. Rebuilding the surface Boason. In the fourth eurogrogrics symposium on engineering processing, SGP ’06, pages 61-70, AIRE-La-Ville, Switzerland, Switzerland, 2006.

[16] K. Kilteni, R. Groten, and M. Slater. Feeling embodiment in virtual reality. Being: Teleopers and virtual environments, 21 (4): 373-387, 2012.

[17] T. Kosch, R. Boldt, M. Hoppe, P. Knierim, and M. Funk. Explore the optimal view of the third person’s experiences outside the body. At the Tenth International Conference Conferences on the Spreading Technologies related to auxiliary environments (Petra 2016). ACM, 2016.

[18] B. LENGGENHARAGER, M. Mouton, and O. Blanc. Spatial aspects of physical self -awareness. Awareness and awareness, 18 (1): 110-117, 2009.

[19] J. -l. Login, c. Do not, and I do not live. Anthropology embodies and neglects the property of the body in virtual reality. In 2015 IEEE virtual reality (VR), pages 229-230. IEEE, 2015.

[20] J. -l. Lugrin, M. Wiedmann, D. Biegersstein, and me latoschik. The effect of the realistic Avatar on the stressful situation is virtual. 2015 IEEE virtual reality (VR), pages 227-228, 2015.

[21] M. Mori, KF Macdorman, and N. Kageki. Wadi Gharib [from the field]. IEEE ROBITICS & AUTOMATION MAGAZINE, 19 (2): 98-100, 2012.

[22] L. Piwek, LS MCKAY, and Fe Pollick. The experimental evaluation of the sunken valley hypothesis failed to confirm the expected effect of the movement. Perception, 130 (3): 271-277, 2014.

[23] R. Preiner, S. Jeschke and M. Wimmer. Automatic Splats: The Dynamic Cloud Conception of the Graphics Processing Unit. In EGPGV, pages 139-148, 2012.

[24] RS Renner, BM Velichkovsky, and JR Helmet. Imagine selfish distances in virtual environments-review. ACM (CSUR), 46 (2): 23, 2013.

[25] C. Ribeiro, R. Kufner, C. Fernandes, and Ja Pereira. 3D illustrations in contemporary dance: promoting video suspension from Tool. In the facts of the third international symposium on movement and computing, MOCO ’16, New York, New York, United States of America, 2016. The Association of Computing Machinery.

[26] B. Ries, V. Interrante, M. Kaeding, and L. Anderson. The effect of self -fragmentation on the perception of the distance in the overwhelming virtual environments. In the facts of the 2008 ACM symposium on virtual reality programs and technology, pages 167-170. ACM, 2008.

[27] S. RUSINKIEWICZ and M. Levoy. QSPlat: Multiple Point Dotting System for large networks. In the facts of the twenty-seventh annual conference on computer drawings and interactive technologies, Siggraph ’00, pages 343-352, New York, New York, USA, 2000. ACM Press/AdDison-Wesley Pubishing Co.

[28] P. salamin, T. Tadi, O. Blanc, F. Vexo, and D. Thaalmann. Determine the effects of exposure to the third and first person’s views in realism -based training. IEEE transactions on learning techniques, 3 (3): 272-276, 2010.

[29] MV Sanchez-Vives, B. Spanlang, A. FRISOLI, M. Bergamasco, and M. Slatter. They are virtual manual caused by high connections. Plos One, 5 (4): E10381, 2010.

[30] M. Slatter, D. Perez Marcos, H. Ehrsson and MV Sanchez-Vives. ´ Towards a digital body: they are the virtual arm. Borders in Human Neuroscience, 2: 6, 2008.

[31] M. Slatter, B. Spanlang, and D. Corominas. Simulation of virtual environments within virtual environments as a basis for psychological physics. ACM transactions on graphics (TOG), 29 (4): 92, 2010.

[32] M. Slatter and M. USOH. The interaction in the body in the immersive virtual environments. Artificial life and virtual reality, 1: 125-148, 1994.

[33] Do not be available. Splatting: balanced feeding algorithm. PhD thesis, North Carolina University in Chapel Hill, 1991.

[34] Y. Yuan and A. Sted. Are they caused by the hand of the virtual virtual reality? In 2010, IEEE (VR), pages 95-102. IEEE, 2010.

[35] M. Zwicker, J ¨ Monkery perspective, 2004.