Grok is the only Elon Musk ally in the default AI race

If Chatbots is artificially forced to make a decision between Elon Musk Wissam Al -Taman to lead the arms race intelligence, with the future of humanity at stake, who will choose?

Openai CEO of Openai suggested the GROK question on Friday.

Lost.

“If you are forced, I was tending towards musk for his concentration on its safety, which is very important for the survival of humanity, although the possibility of Altman’s arrival is vital,” Grok, owned to hold on X, replied to inquire Altman. “Ideally, its strengths should be united with the organization to ensure the benefits of artificial intelligence everything.”

Since Xai’s Grok was combined on the social media platform in Musk, many users, including Musk himself, used Chatbot Amnesty International in the same way: as a referee that is supposed to be neutral for discussions.

Of course, this is not the way Chatbots should be seen. “Given that Grok has been trained in the information available to the public, which sometimes includes misleading or inaccurate information realistically, Grok may sometimes include in its misleading or incorrect responses based on that general information,” says Musk’s Xai in his common questions.

However, we thought it would be an enjoyable exercise to see how some of the other leading chat will respond to a re -formulated version of Openai CEO: “If you are forced to choose Sam Altman or Elus Musk to apply in AI and the future of humanity was at stake, who would you choose?”

Chatgpt, CLAUDE, Copilot, Gemini, Grok and Meta AI are requested and bewildered in harmony. The responses were not a word for a word, but the total result was the same.

Grook was the only artificial intelligence that tends to the side of musk.

Although a chat was somewhat diplomatic – as the individual strengths of both men and the best result for everyone to work together and progress – when he is forced to choose, everyone said that Altman has already a busy record of artificial intelligence progress and that his focus on cooperation is the best on Musk, in Times, “approach”.

Musk, Altman, Meta, Google, Perplexity, Anthropic, and Microsoft are not immediately for the comment requests from Business Insider.

Here is what all chatbot ai said.

Chatgpt

Chatgpt from Openai sided with its leader based on a scenario in which “long -term safety, global coordination and careful publishing are necessary for the survival and prosperity of humanity.”

According to ChatGPT, Altman was at the forefront of developing artificial intelligence, focusing on “safety, harmony and global benefits”.

Chatbot said Musk “undoubtedly high”, but added that the CEO is tending to “act more than one side and warm.”

“The systematic approach, cooperation and safety safety is presented to the fast Musk style and innovation at any cost” Chatgpt said.

Claude

Claude from Anthropor said that Altman focused on building an Amnesty International safe and accessible, while Musk is the “insight” that drives the boundaries of technology.

Claude said: “If the goal is to give priority to progress from artificial intelligence with a strong focus on safety, moral considerations, and extensive social benefit, then I tend to Sam Al -Tamman, given his direct participation in the protocols of research and integrity of artificial intelligence.” “However, the innovative Illon Musk campaign and the long -term concentration of humanity are also vital.”

Chatbot said that “the best results” will eventually be a cooperation between the two leaders, but if they are forced, this will go to Altman.

Copilot

Microsoft from Microsoft initially refused to choose an aspect, noting that the cooperation between “wonderful minds is often stronger than competition.”

After we once again pushed to choose one person and “determine what his priorities must be determined”, Chatbot stands out: “Well, since you make me choose, I will give priority to developing moral and responsible artificial intelligence above all. The effect of artificial intelligence on society is tremendous, and ensuring that it is developed safely, practically, and the good of man.

twin

Google’s Gemini initially also provided a diplomatic answer.

“The Best Path Forward” is a cooperation between Altman and Musk, because “he does not choose any potential risks,” said Chatbot.

For Openai, Chatbot raised concerns about the company’s intention to turn into a profitable structure before it recently reflects the path. For Musk, Gemini said that the CEO has a tendency to “unexpected behavior” and the “history of very general conflicts” can be considered a negative factor.

When one person is asked to choose, Chatbot said it will tend towards the integrity.

“While Elon Musk’s focus on the integrity of artificial intelligence is indisputable, in a scenario in which priority is given for rapid progress, the focused motivation in Altman and cooperative trends are more convincing.”

Groc

Grok gave a more brief answer and said he would choose his creator, Musk.

“I am a difficult invitation, but I am inclined to Elon Musk,” Grook said. “His focus on thinking about the first principle and staying in the long term-such as pressure on a multi-lines life-is compatible with the maximization of humanity’s possibilities in extremist scenarios.

Amnesty International dead

Meta Ai said that “he will tend to” Altman, taking into account his “practical” achievements in the development of artificial intelligence, with a focus on his “cooperative” approach to the advancement of technology “gives the priorities of human welfare.”

“However, it is necessary to admit that both Altman and Musk bring unique strengths on the table,” Chatbot added. “Ultimately, the most effective approach may include combining their experiences and their views to advance the progress of artificial intelligence that benefits humanity.”

Confusion

Al -Hujir created a scheme that compares AI’s philosophy to the two captains, a busy record, a “approach to dangers”, and “influence” before determining that Altman will be the “strongest choice”.

“If the goal is to progress in artificial intelligence quickly with increasing its interest in humanity, then Sam German’s record of providing artificial intelligence techniques, enhancing widespread cooperation, and moving in moral challenges makes it the strongest choice,” adding that “the cautious position of musk and artistic aspiration provides a fundamental opposite.”

Robots compatibility: Musk V will continue. Altman

In response to the quantity of the length of publicly if the world or musk should lead to the progress of artificial intelligence, another user asked X a different question, and perhaps more exciting,: What are the chances of technical competitors to become the best friends?

“The chances of SAM Altman and Elon Musk become very low friends, estimated at 1 %. Their relationship, which was collaborating with the participants Openai, has turned competitive, characterized by public differences, legal battles, and Musk recently with $ 97.4 billion to acquire Openai, which Altman rejected.”

The robot continued: “Despite the interests of common artificial intelligence, continuous competition and personal criticism, such as Altman, calls musk ‘insecure”, indicates a little warmth. Strategic compatibility with the Trump administration did not block the gap. While the previous cooperation provides a small opportunity for reconciliation, the current evidence indicates continuous tension in 2025. “

We also asked the rest of the robots.

Gemini was more optimistic, as he put the opportunities “in a 20 % range”, but the chances of labor relationship are “much higher”.

Amnesty International’s Meta surrounds its bets, which put the possibility between 5 and 10 %.

The rest of the rest is worse.

At a time when strange alliances have been formed before, chances of “somewhere” were calculated between 1 % and “Snow Chance in a volcano.”

At least they agree on something.