Elon Musk asked a federal judge to reject Openai’s reflection, describing it as legally hollow and signing the artificial intelligence laboratory that has deviated from his charitable mission.
In a 33-page proposal submitted on Wednesday, Musk’s lawyers and AI, Xai, have argued that the intention of the intention of 97.375 billion dollars to buy Openai-relevant complaints-covered with the protection of the first amendment and the concession of litigation in California.
“The non -profit organizations are nothing more than a discomfort standing in the way of the aspirations of the profit that is driven by the profit,” Samar’s lawyer Mark Tobrov said in the file, referring to the CEO of Openai, Sam Al -Tamman.
“The anti -Openai claims are not only failing, but they assert Openai’s betrayal of its charitable mission and the public in general,” Tobrov added.
In the court file in April, Openai Musk was accused of carrying a “uncompromising” campaign to harm the company, including press attacks, legal threats, and “malicious” of $ 97.4 billion – part of what was called personal revenge after he left Musk Openai in 2018.
Musk describes Openai’s axis as “interface”
The latest Musk files, which were submitted at the Northern District Court in California, come after Openai said on Monday that he will not Transfer control away from non -profit after all.
Chatgpt maker said he will restructure his profit arm as a company of general interest, while maintaining comprehensive control with her non-profit father-a step that she says reflects her task better.
Musk Legal Team is not convinced. On Wednesday’s file, they called the axis of restructuring “an interface that does not change anything”, on the pretext that it does not do much to restore the original goals that serve the audience without profitability.
In his file in April, Openai called the MUSK intention on February 10 to purchase Openai’s assets “and suggested that his presentation was” a reference for joking “for a scientific figure called” 974 PRF “. However, the Musk team said in its presentation on Wednesday that the show was real, supported by funds capable of closing a deal, and “has nothing to do with literary references.”
Openai meters said that the offer of $ 97.4 billion could have been shaking the investor’s confidence or raising the cost of capital. But the legal Musk team said on Wednesday that the complaint had failed to name any investors who moved away. Last month, Openaii raised an additional $ 40 billion in a tour driven by Softbank.
The legal clash is now heading to court. The American boycott judge, iPhone Gonzalez Rogers, set a trial in the first phase of Mossk violation requests in 2026, where she operated the confrontation of the high -risk court hall between two original Openai tools that now lead the competing AI projects.
Openai and Xai lawyers did not respond immediately to request a comment from Business Insider.
