Modern data from sand dune analyzes reveals that the financing of garden has witnessed a remarkable growth in its platform in BTC bodies, user reactions, and the total fees collected during the second quarter of 2025 compared to Q1.
It is worth noting that the platform that offered the funding of the park has facilitated the size of the BTC total of 24,984 BTC, and translated into more than $ 1.5 billion in 40,571 atomic bodies. It also accumulated 40.11 BTC in the drawings, with the largest exchange of its platform up to 10 BTC.
The data was placed for them as the “fastest Bitcoin Bridge”, which is the impressive growth in Garden Finance in the first half of 2025, clearly shown in Sandinity analysis plans.
However, this increase did not pass without anyone noticing. Zachxbt raised suspicions, even accused a funding for money laundering associated with encryption shells, including penetration of $ 1.4 billion.
Read to understand the entire story.
Zachxbt claim to finance the park
Recent allegations against the park financing appeared in a sudden development followed by Jaz Gulati, the founder of the platform. In the previous publication, his success was highlighted by sharing a picture of the fees collected in the first week of June.
It is interesting that a known name in the encryption sector, Zachxbt has appeared. As accused The generation protocol is more than 80 % of its modern fees by laundering, with the help of Chinese forests connected to the Lazaros Group.
This claim made by the Inchene detective, who was made in X earlier today at the end of the third week of June, has sparked great attention within the encryption community. Since this raises severe and urgent questions about the merit of decentralized platforms.
Garden financing founder denies allegations and is considered unfounded
In the wake of Zachbt allegations, Jaz Gulati, founder of Garden Finance, responded, referring to a previous job where they mentioned that they had received 30 BTC before a bybit penetration. Attach a Screenshot From this post from Q4 2024 to support his demand.
Despite the defense of my tour, Zakkabti doubled, Indicate To other breakfasts related to DPRK, including the Wazirx accident, which occurred before penetration by BYBIT.
He also asked about the legitimacy of the garden financing, describing it as a “unjust central bridge”. In response, my tour rejected this description as wrong information, describing the naming of “fake decentralization” that is unfounded.
“No fake central”, again with wrong information
Jaz
(jzgulati) June 21, 2025
In a later comment, Zachxbt claimed that one representative was constantly leading the COINBASE COINBASE of the Chinese strangers while moving stolen money from bybit.
However, Gulati has not yet responded to this specified accusation, despite his previous quick responses.
A new member joins the stock exchange
After three hours of silence from my tour, another user, James Score, joined the discussion, apparently to support my tour.
SCAUR suggested that a Parito distribution It may apply, as a small number of liquidity providers (LPS) contribute to the majority of liquidity. He pointed out that this does not necessarily mean central; This may simply mean that only one LP was able to meet the demand at the time.
Regarding the topic of banning the bidders from the penetrated sources, SCAUR admitted that it is a complex problem that is still difficult to solve.
Recently, Zachxbt made a blow to James Score’s support for the platform, as he again criticized the park financing because of his lack of decentralization, noting that since the maximum large barters were raised to 10 CBBTC, it was only one entity to meet for weeks.
He highlighted that outside the Bybit boxes, the platform has the minimum activity, which makes it easy to discover illegal transactions in Mempool. With the flooding of the IBID transactions since April 2025, he indicated that the team was warned of this issue.
He suggested that if they could not prevent these transactions, they must repeat the fees created and disrupt more bodies, instead of boasting about their drawings while knowing their origins.
In addition, it was mentioned that 30 BTC in the drawings is largely due to the Airdrop transplantation from early 2024.
The hot exchange of responses has risen to X since then to a general dispute, but the claim seems strong coming from the results of Zachbt. If the stock exchange continues, this may lead to legal audit to financing the garden.
Do not miss any rhythm in the world of encryption!
Stay in the foreground with urgent news, expert analysis, actual time updates about the latest trends in Bitcoin, Altcoins, Defi, NFTS and more.
Common questions
Bybit suffered a major penetration on February 21, 2025, which led to the theft of about $ 1.5 billion of ETHEREM codes. The attack, which is attributed to the Lazaros Group in North Korea, took advantage of the weaknesses of the interface of a multi -signed wallet user.
Garden financing is the “Bitcoin Bridge” platform that it claims to allow the fast, unintended Bitcoin bites, using atomic bias and architecture -based architecture. It has facilitated more than $ 1.5 billion in BTC size.
Curricula bridges can be used to transfer stolen money via Blockchains, which makes them more difficult to track them. The accusations against the financing of gardens indicate that the specific actors use this to launder the hacked money.
