Binance recently launched two mechanisms that enable society to make a decision on the distinguished code lists (voting on the list) and blurring (voting to delete).
However, behind these two initiatives, a decisive question arises: Is there any bias in how to manage the Binance, the distinctive symbol portfolio?
BNB series projects dominate “voting on the list”
On March 20, 2025, Binance began The first batch From “voting to the list”. After this announcement, the new BNB series codes, including broccoli, Koma, and Banas31, secured their lists on the largest exchange in the world.
This is similar to how the Binance opening is a vote for society to report if the PI is listed.
A day later, on March 21, 2025, Binance topped the headlines again by presenting them.Voting on the crossing“. The first 21 symbols It was chosen for the potential deletion was JASMY, ZEC, FTT, Elf, SNT, STPT, Bal, ARK, GPS, MBL, PROS, CTXC, Hard, Beta, Crine, Firo, VIDT, Nurs, Toyy, Alpaca and UFT.
These events shed light on Binance’s ambition to give more decision -making authority to society. However, they also ask an important question: Is there a bias in how to manage Binance’s distinctive symbol? While the BNB series dominates “voting on the list”, does “vote on deletion” really provide a fair field of projects from other Blockchains?
“Voting to deletion”: Do you prefer Binance its ecological system?
Interestingly, the alpaca only belongs to the BNB series among the 21 distinctive symbols that aim to delete. The remaining ethereum, the base, and other Blockchain ecosystem. These symbols have been marked with a “monitoring mark” due to low liquidity, lack of team updates or community weakness.
At this stage, the contrast between “voting to the list” and “voting to deletion” reveals an interesting pattern. This process appears to be a balance in Blockchain diversity, and the BNB series may prefer in the menus with targeting external projects to delete.
At the same time, while the Binance menu standards, such as liquidity, project development, and community activity, apply to all distinctive symbols, often fighting BNB series projects to compete with the features inherent in the distinctive symbols within the BNB series ecosystem.
The mechanisms of “voting to the list” and “voting to deletion” are important steps towards the rule that society drives. However, the contrast to the representation of Blockchain raises concerns about fairness in managing the distinctive symbol.
This is a trial. It remains to see whether Binance will make adjustments to ensure a more stadium or whether the BNB series will continue to enjoy a distinguished center on the stock exchange.
Disintegration
In adherence to the confidence project guidance, beincrypto is committed to unprepared and transparent reporting. This news article aims to provide accurate information in time. However, readers are advised to independently verify facts and consult with a professional before making any decisions based on this content. Please note that the terms, conditions, privacy policy have been updated and the evacuation of responsibility.
