Coingecko conducted a recent survey on the opinions of the artificial intelligence user, especially on evidence of personality (POP). The vast majority of users want to distinguish between humans from artificial intelligence and open to pop adoption.
Evidence for the POP is a mechanism designed to verify that the user is a unique person – not a robot, not Amnesty International, not a duplicate identity. Many users feel that it is very important with the spread of artificial intelligence and independent factors across digital platforms.
Is the character the next big direction in artificial intelligence?
Artificial intelligence projects have witnessed a popular decrease during the past months, due to the large -scale factors of economics and other accounts that dominate an area of 3. However, the development of the artificial intelligence agent remains strong.
Artificial intelligence agents are now very integrated in Crypto Twitter and social media. They are leading conversations, changing novels, and even creating a dialog box. Therefore, the personality concept has become a critical discussion between the encryption community.
Recently, Coingecko A. reconnaissance On the opinions related to the prosecution and the identification of the personality.
COININECO data shows that most artificial intelligence users believe a firm belief that it is important to know if they interact with humans. Nearly half of the respondents believe this task is “very important”, and 92 % believe it is at least important.
This can help explain the reason for proving the personality (POP), a pioneering concept by Sam Altman’s WorldCoin, has remained a permanent idea in artificial intelligence space.
What is the problem then? Although this survey shows that artificial intelligence users want to identify the character, this does not mean that every person is ready to adopt pop styles as it has been laid down or understood.
Almost half of the users were ready or somewhat ready to try them, but it was a much smaller margin than the other question.
Moreover, the survey decided that only 30.3 % of the respondents believe it is extremely important to distinguish between humans from artificial intelligence and that they are also ready to adopt evidence of personal methods.
On the other hand, 18.3 % believed that human identification was important but they were neutral or opposed to pop activity.
The survey was not described as specific POP protocols from any one project. Pop generally includes the use of unconventional verification forms, such as biometric data, social media profiles, or other methods that are difficult to falsify or repeat, but there is no single industrial standard yet.
Given that another survey in Coingecko has determined the low interest of artificial intelligence investment, this contradiction in voting may be a problem. Artificial intelligence users are often united in relation to the case, but proposed solutions are more controversial.
A heavy approach to the character’s question may lead to removing users from artificial intelligence. This is far from the ideal in the current market.
However, it is important not to exaggerate the level of controversy. Although less than half of the artificial intelligence users want to adopt evidence of the character, a group of hostile participants was relatively small.
There are a large number of opposite people, and they may respond well to new protocols, marketing campaigns or other incentives.
In general, it is clear that pop became a major discussion point in the web3 community. As independent factors are acquired, POP may be a warm wall between digital manipulation and real participation.
Disintegration
In adherence to the confidence project guidance, beincrypto is committed to unprepared and transparent reporting. This news article aims to provide accurate information in time. However, readers are advised to independently verify facts and consult with a professional before making any decisions based on this content. Please note that the terms, conditions, privacy policy have been updated and the evacuation of responsibility.
