President Donald Trump’s bill and spectacular entitled “The Law of One Bill One Law” suggests that it put an end to the states of artificial intelligence (AI) for a period of 10 years, which angered state governments as well as political leaders. Here is everything we know about the proposal and the consequences if it is passed.
Trump’s bill and its spending was controversial from the beginning and faced a lot of reverse reaction, including Elon Musk, which was a few days among the main advisers of the president, headed by the Ministry of Government efficiency (Dog).
The opposition of the bill was mainly revolving around the tax cuts of the wealthy while reducing spending on food and medical assistance, as well as subsidies for green energy transmission. The draft law will add $ 2.4 trillion to the US federal budget deficit over the next decade, making the country’s financial situation more dangerous.
Trump’s bills call for them to reduce the authority of states in organizing artificial intelligence
Returning to rulings on artificial intelligence regulations, the draft law says that there is no state “may impose any law or regulation that regulates the models of artificial intelligence, artificial intelligence systems or mechanical decision -making systems during a period of 10 years starting from the date of enacting this law.”
While artificial intelligence regulations are still developing, some states, including California and New York and Utah, have enacted their artificial intelligence laws. What makes the proposal to prevent states from organizing artificial intelligence is more confused is the fact that at the present time, there are no comprehensive federal regulations in the United States, even when President Trump and his predecessor, Joe Biden, signed executive orders to himself.
Trump’s executive matter spoke about “removal of barriers” to develop artificial intelligence
Biden command She talked about “safe, safe, and confident development, and the use of artificial intelligence” while highlighting the need for the United States to stay “competitive in the global economy.” but, Trump’s executive order “Some of the current artificial intelligence policies and directives that act as barriers in front of the innovation of American artificial intelligence, spoiling the US path to act decisively to retain global leadership in artificial intelligence.” Trump generally preferred lower regulations, even as some argue that indolence regulations can return to chase them later.
Artificial intelligence regulations were a burning problem not only in the United States but also worldwide. While it is expected to enhance productive technology and lead to the creation of new jobs and industries, there are concerns about the privacy of data and the increasing threat of deep conflicts using artificial intelligence tools.
The discussion about countries that regulate artificial intelligence
Meanwhile, there are arguments with and against the countries with the authority to organize artificial intelligence. First, there is still a federal law that does not regulate artificial intelligence, and the bill seeks to prevent states from having their own regulations without providing an alternative. As an executive of the anthropologist Dario Amoudi He wrote in an article in the New York Times“Without a clear plan for a federal response, the endowment would give us the worst in both worlds – no countries’ ability to act, and there is no national policy as a successor.” State levels can also act as a test ground and can help address country issues. What makes the judgment to cause concern in particular is that the language indicates that it prevents states from organizing independent leadership, which is still vulnerable to accidents.
Those who spend curbing the ability of states to organize artificial intelligence argue that confusing regulations between different countries can hinder the pace of developing artificial intelligence in the United States at a time when China picks up quickly and launches low -cost Amnesty International models in a wave. The conflicting regulations between states and the absence of a uniform law can be strangled at a time when the United States needs to maintain the initiative of China in artificial intelligence.
Can the federal government stop the states from the organization of artificial intelligence?
There is also a question mark on whether the federal government can impose such a law, as the tenth amendment states, “The powers that have not been delegated to the United States through the constitution, and are not prohibited from the states, are reserved to the states, respectively, or to the people.”
Moreover, the proposal may not hold Bird, This restricts the inclusion of “external” rulings in reconciliation bills such as the Trump tax bill. However, the base only applies to the Senate, and the House of Representatives does not have a similar base.
The draft law has already gone through the House of Representatives and now needs to reach the Senate. Amid the clear legal challenges and the loud opposition, the Trade, Science and Transport Committee of the Senate changed the text of the House of Representatives on the lists of artificial intelligence. He now says that the countries will need to abandon their ability to organize artificial intelligence if they want to reach Federal broader financing.
Meanwhile, the draft law receives a reaction not only from Democrats from some Republicans as well. Sens. Marsha Blackburn (R-CENN) and Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) Among those who spoke against judgments. While Holie said that the endowment on Amnesty International’s regulations is “better to be out”, ” Blackburn said“We definitely know that in Tennessee, we need this protection.”
The issue of federal transcendence
Everyone said that the endowment on the prohibition of states from the enactment of the artificial intelligence list seems to be a blatant state of federal transcendence, which is always done by Republicans. However, the proposal receives support from Openai, which was pressing for the preventive endowment on the laws of Amnesty International for the State. The CEO of the company, Sam German, who was criticizing Trump in his first period and donated to the Political Committee of Joa Biden, is now among the main supporters of Trump.
https://x.com/sama/status/1923428713095479437
Altman was among the business leaders who joined Trump on his visit to the Middle East, where AI deals were signed billions of dollars. Then he criticized those who criticize these deals as “naive”. Technology leaders often supported and supported Trump’s policies, which led to allegations of Quid Pro Quo. For example, on April 13, shortly after the CEO of NVIDIA, Jensen Huang, at a $ 1 million dinner in Mar-A-Lago, Trump gave technical goods such as smartphones and potatoes from mutual definitions.
Likewise, many claim that Musk (and his companies) has benefited greatly from the billionaire association with Trump, and as part of Dog, he canceled positions and financing in agencies that were investigating issues against his companies, such as NLRB. Elon Musk has managed to obtain a coexist without driver from Trump, which would help launch Tesla Robotaxi.
