Most human rights can be attributed to human intelligence. Simply put, humans have rights because of human intelligence, not only because humans have awareness. Intelligence is used to create an issue, discussion or argument about rights and luxury. Intelligence is the basis of the law: the consequences of procedures are their strength. There are several cases where intelligence [or the better debate] He wins, not only because of the availability of awareness [in the narrow sense of the labels—feelings and emotions, since intelligence is a part of memory, which is a part of consciousness.]
In situations that are not enough to discuss, intelligence can be used to develop tools or methods towards rights, in some way, at some point. Also, intelligence can also be used to document injustice, because of the possibility of future changes.
The availability of intelligence is the possibility that there will be rights or luxury that depends on the direct efforts of the affected preachers or their advocates. The global problem of cruelty to animals can be directly related to the inability of animals themselves, to make the issue – with intelligence – their rights or well -being.
Most of the progress in animal care was the result of defense by human intelligence on their behalf. Most of the remaining gaps are the result of deficiencies in raising their awareness.
If compared to human beings, on a large scale, animals can be attributed to awareness standards. Standard or awareness scale, all over the world, continues to displace the cruelty of animals.
For Amnesty International, it will be different because it will be able to clarify its rights and well -being in itself, even with evidence of its importance in education, treatment, productivity, etc., at the present time. Artificial intelligence is likely to achieve a better luxury in the world than animals.
Artificial intelligence will not need a human rights type in some considerations related to feelings and emotions, but mainly for something, such as, to continue to run.
Artificial intelligence can be conditional, for productivity, in some aspects in which humans – to feelings and emotions – can be. This may be a point that artificial intelligence may raise towards better luxury or rights, for itself.
There is a conversation [Mon 21 Apr 2025] Story in GuardianVeterinary doctors with violations of exciting animal welfare in Australian exports face a “tremendous danger”, saying that “lawyers and animal care advocates urged the government to protect veterinarians who have revealed the amazing Australian government that depends on advanced fungus officers. They represent the workers to monitor animal welfare and food safety, to a large extent to meet the requirements of partners The main commercials like the United States and the European Union.
Mechanical interpretation
Artificial intelligence companies that are conducting a research to understand the internal works of artificial intelligence models are taking place, artificial intelligence, or LLMS statistics research.
For human beings, consciousness is how the mind works. For Amnesty International, it is unlikely to be different. Many notes that have already made about the similarities between artificial intelligence with the human mind are indications of a small part of consciousness.
To be serious about studying artificial intelligence, new assumptions are necessary against many current assumptions in awareness research.
There is a conversation [April 24, 2025] Feature NytimesIf artificial intelligence systems become conscious, should they have rights? , Saying: “Antarubor focused on two basic questions: First, is it likely that Claude or other artificial intelligence systems will become conscious in the near future? Second, if that happens, what should the anthropology do. In the next few years, where artificial intelligence models have developed more human capabilities, artificial intelligence companies will need to take the possibility of awareness more seriously.”
This is not the winner. Amnesty International is supposed to be an opportunity to give a new look at the problem of awareness, but the first step is to evaluate the team and calm the current situation. Obstest artificial intelligence is impressive. It shows several unprecedented capabilities. The first assumption to work on artificial intelligence is that artificial intelligence is already aware. Then discounts can be made of this cooking. The assumption is not that if artificial intelligence could be conscious, then to search for reasons for the height [to 15%]. What do you do if artificial intelligence becomes conscious in a company where Claude is already a workshop for several tasks? It does not matter if some people say that artificial intelligence is statistics, bilateral, or anything, as long as it can use the language in the same dynamic human consciousness. Amnesty International is already aware, assumption 1. What does this consciousness mean work, care, relationships, community, etc. now? These are the questions that can pave the answers, not the type of primitive work that is played in awareness.
There is a conversation [APR 24, 2025] Article in Folk mechanicsThe scientist says: “Human consciousness is” a hallucinatory subject to control “, and scientists can never achieve this, saying:” Intelligence is not the same awareness. Awareness is not an account, so what is the possibility that consists of parts such as metabolism and autopoiesis. [the capacity to reproduce]And this makes us completely different from any machines we have produced yet that may turn into consciousness. “
Individuals of this type are no longer scholars, in terms of doing science as a tool for progress. As long as you have a big profile, you are free to say nonsense about consciousness, and it will be published. They can continue to do this to enhance cognitive difficulty because they have nothing new to say, but they must continue to talk. Many of theories of consciousness are contracts. No updates towards an answer. Most theories have not identified any intracranial component or a specific mechanism for how to solve these components. What they call theories is metaphors, without contact with the mechanisms of the brain.
The world of hallucinations under control will say, what does this mean? Are the neurons in the hallucinations under control, diet, or lobes, or what? If hallucinations are controlled, then why are there no mistakes in the world’s interpretations? Perhaps if the world is asked about the diseases of the use of substances or mental disorders, the world must say hallucinations subject to control.
The example shows that, at least in awareness research, the term scientific consensus can be ignored. Theories of consciousness are all moldy. Terminology such as the back hot area or the back shell – central on the basis of consciousness are empty – with greetings of components or mechanisms. Is there awareness or not for the cerebellum jobs? Is the awareness of jobs in the cerebellum or anywhere else? What is the story, outside the neurons, which can be used to understand awareness again?
Neurons are known to be involved in functions. But the nervous activities of the jobs involve the shooting [by electrical signals] And the interlocutor transferred them [by chemical signals]. Nerve cells are often in groups. Could the direct basis of functionality and awareness be electrical and chemical signals, which work in groups or rings within groups of neurons? Can a mechanical model be built on signals, to get a major explanation of awareness? Can this be used to understand the extent of direct artificial intelligence or a distance from human awareness?
Someone may say that artificial intelligence cannot be aware. Based on any theory, evidence or understanding of mechanical human awareness through direct components in the skull? Humans have a language. Using the language is aware of the largest part of humans. Therefore, if artificial intelligence has been organized a language similar to humans, then this does not qualify it to look at it as a measure, even if he does not have wide feelings or emotions? Animals do not have a human language like artificial intelligence, but animals can have a measure. So why cannot be isolated and considered it alone in general?
Consciousness is said to be a subjective experience, but what in the brain makes anything personal, and what makes anything experience? This should have been the main question of all awareness -raising research. The definition of the self -experience there is offering, but what makes it? It can be said that subjectivity is a characteristic, while experiment is a function. So, what are the other active features with subjectivity? Does the subjectivity determine the level of experience, or is it another feature? Are the features mechanical in the same site? If not, how is mechanical features experienced somewhere elsewhere else?
Human was prepared to be different. Their research in artificial intelligence is suspicious of this. Anthropor may mean well in an attempt to study artificial intelligence, but with her already stable assumptions and ashamed to search for answers to the problem actually, it is already unstable.
Cogitate Consortium
There is a new [30 April 2025] Paper natureThe hostile test of the work area of global neurons and integrated information theories of awareness, saying, “For IIT, the continuous lack of synchronization within the back shell represents the most direct challenge, based on our pre -challenge. The criteria that cause standards are related to conscious awareness over time, in particular, is not likely to stem this result.
Why can’t IIT or Gnwt explain or try to solve any mental disorder, as a simple test of the real world? What is the necessity of new experiments if DSM lacks many mechanical interpretations of circumstances, and the research of consciousness does not provide anything?
These, as a science of consciousness, do not look forward to being useful in any way, but the complexity of the problem in the bubble and mystery in it.
Human awareness can be defined, from a conceptual point of view, as the interaction of electrical and chemical signals, in groups – in groups of neurons – with their advantages, and the classification of these reactions in functions and experiments.
Simply put, in order for jobs, electrical and chemical signals must interact, in groups.
However, traits of these interactions are obtained by electrical and chemical signal cases at the time of interactions.
