The co-founder of Metadao publicly shared the position against SIMD-0228 proposal, and instead called for focusing on a dynamic base for Solana. He explained that he previously supported SIMD -0096 because it has dealt with the necessary economic changes, such as adjusting Solana enlargement, which is believed to have to occur to ensure the operation of the sustainable network. He emphasized that the costs of operating the network should be justified, with a focus on measurable factors such as the cost for each byte.
The co -founder of Metadao wants to focus Solana on the dynamic price
1/2-Simd 0228
So you are absent from the conversation. And I think I will publicly present my point that I was participating in particular. I encouraged the vote yes at SIMD -0096 because any changes to the economy require removing any estuaric parameters to fix things …
– Naluk
(Employment!) (@Metanallok) March 7, 2025
The co -founder argued that the Solana network, which facilitates a great economic activity, should be managed by the able individuals, and that decentralization should be preserved without “reaching a gate.”
It is believed that the ideal approach should include defining clear requirements for fighters, which may include a small group that can deal with global processes, such as supporting major exchanges in various continents. Over time, this audit group may grow but it must be sufficiently flexible to expand its scope.
He also highlighted the importance of space, and saw it as a valuable commodity. He believes that Solana’s technology should expand, with the primary layer becomes cheaper over time, similar to Internet growth, as the cost has decreased for each byte with the growth of use and value. This should be the economic model for Solana, where the bachelors can attract the share by running effective trading strategies.
He explained that “the cost per vicinity has decreased, increased consumption, and the value created at the top. This is the economies of the final state that we must represent. The operation of the auditor will go to this way from my point of view, there is nothing to stop it because it is just a fair market in playing.”
The co-founder also expressed his concerns about the focus of SIMD-0228 on inflation, indicating that inflation should be controlled through direct share payments instead. He believes that the effect of the proposal may not be as important as expected and it is recommended to reduce its scope in half while allowing future amendments based on long -term data. In the end, it is believed that the focus should turn towards a dynamic base fee instead of an inflationary model.
Also read: Raydium criticizes PEMP.fun potential AMM Shift as a strategic mistake
